Fig. 5: Comparison experiment with semi-supervised AMR methods. | Nature Communications

Fig. 5: Comparison experiment with semi-supervised AMR methods.

From: Multi-representation domain attentive contrastive learning based unsupervised automatic modulation recognition

Fig. 5

a–d Recognition accuracy(%) on RML2016.10A dataset for N = 10,20,50 and the overview radar map respectively. e–h Recognition accuracy(%) on RML2016.10B dataset for N = 10,20,50 and the overview radar map respectively. i–l Recognition accuracy(%) on RML2018.01A dataset for N = 10,20,50 and the overview radar map respectively. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

Back to article page