Table 1 Results of the phylogenetic meta-analysis models revealing the interaction of traits and threat status in moderating pollen limitation

From: Global meta-analysis shows that threatened flowering plants have higher pollination deficits

Trait

n

QM

p-value of QM

p-value of the likelihood-ratio test

AF

2074

98.25

<0.0001

<0.0001

BS1

2075

95.46

<0.0001

0.0006

BS2

1147

6.03

0.1104

0.0708

BS3

2128

4.13

0.2478

0.1555

BS4

840

2.59

0.4595

0.2772

BS5

608

8.64

0.0345

0.0710

LH1

2128

3.43

0.3302

0.1831

LH2

2128

5.21

0.1567

0.1120

LH3

2128

25.29

<0.0001

0.2048

Overall floral structure

2128

74.80

<0.0001

<0.0001

Flower symmetry

1661

7.78

0.0508

0.1357

Type of reward

887

46.58

<0.0001

0.1055

Reward accessibility

610

0.49

0.9210

0.8948

Continent

2128

88.71

<0.0001

0.1773

Region

2128

18.67

0.0003

0.0145

  1. n sample size, AF autofertility; BS breeding system, BS1 self-compatibility, BS2 heterostyly, BS3 sexual system, BS4 dichogamy, BS5 herkogamy, LH life history, LH1 life span, LH2 reproductive frequency, LH3 growth form, QM test statistic of the omnibus test of moderators in the two-tailed phylogenetic meta-analysis, the two-tailed likelihood-ratio tests showed the relationship between threat status and pollen limitation variation.
Back to article page