Fig. 4: Functional differences between rumen community types. | Nature Communications

Fig. 4: Functional differences between rumen community types.

From: Protozoal populations drive system-wide variation in the rumen microbiome

Fig. 4

a, b Summaries of KEGG Orthologs (KOs) in pathways of interest (based on20) and CAZymes in (a) bacterial and (b) protozoal genera of interest (based on Fig. 2g). CAZymes and KOs were chosen by selecting the 10 pathways or substrates (right-side labels) including the largest amount of features with p < 0.1 between RCTs, then trimming the list to CAZymes and KOs (y-axis labels) detected as differentially abundant at least 5 times across each row. metaT: metatranscriptomics (n = 24; DESeq2), metaP: metaproteomics (n = 22; Wilcoxon rank-sum tests). “CAZy: multiple substrates” contains CAZymes that may act upon various linkages and/or substrates. c. Metabolomic comparisons: volatile fatty acids (VFAs; n = 21) and metabolites from untargeted metabolomics (annotation level 1 or 2a; n = 24) with p < 0.1 (Wilcoxon rank-sum tests). Diamonds: medians, whiskers: IQR. ** p < 0.01, *: p < 0.05, ·: 0.1 > p > 0.05. All tests (ac) were two-sided and multiple comparison corrected with Benjamini-Hochberg false discovery rate. Data for this figure are available in Supplementary Data 5.

Back to article page