Fig. 4: GenSeg achieves performance on par with baseline models while requiring significantly fewer training examples. | Nature Communications

Fig. 4: GenSeg achieves performance on par with baseline models while requiring significantly fewer training examples.

From: Generative AI enables medical image segmentation in ultra low-data regimes

Fig. 4

a The in-domain generalization performance of GenSeg-UNet and GenSeg-DeepLab with different numbers of training examples from the FetReg, FUSeg, JSRT, and ISIC datasets in segmenting placental vessels, foot ulcers, lungs, and skin lesions, compared to UNet and DeepLab. b The out-of-domain generalization performance of GenSeg-UNet and GenSeg-DeepLab with different numbers of training examples in segmenting lungs (using examples from JSRT for training, and NLM-SZ and NLM-MC for testing) and skin lesions (using examples from ISIC for training, and DermIS and PH2 for testing), compared to UNet and DeepLab. In all panels, bar heights represent the mean, and error bars indicate the standard deviation across three independent runs with different random seeds. Results from individual runs are shown as black triangles. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

Back to article page