Fig. 5: Field insecticidal efficacy of the UNI-EMB compared with commercial microemulsion (ME) and soluble granules (SG). | Nature Communications

Fig. 5: Field insecticidal efficacy of the UNI-EMB compared with commercial microemulsion (ME) and soluble granules (SG).

From: A unimolecule nanopesticide delivery system applied in field scale for enhanced pest control

Fig. 5

a Images of cabbage leaves treated with CK (H2O), UNI(high), commercial ME and SG. The word in the board means “Field efficacy trial of emamectin benzoate against the Spodoptera exigua”. b Field control efficacy on Spodoptera exigua third instar larvae with the treatments of UNI(high) (3.4 g·ha−1), UNI(low) (1.9 g·ha−1), ME (3.4 g·ha−1), SG (3.4 g·ha−1). c Images of cabbage leaves treated with CK (H2O), UNI(high), ME and SG. d Field control efficacy on Brevicoryne brassicae larvae with the treatments of UNI(high) (22.5 g·ha−1), UNI(low) (18.0 g·ha−1), ME (22.5 g·ha−1), SG (22.5 g·ha−1). e Images of pear leaves treated with CK (H2O), UNI(high), ME and SG. f Field control efficacy on Psylla chinensis larvae with the treatments of UNI(high) (285 mg·L−1), UNI(low) (207 mg·L−1), ME (285 mg·L−1) and SG (285 mg·L−1). b, d, f n = 3 biological independent replicates; Data is presented as mean values ± SD. Statistical significance is calculated by one-way ANOVA with post hoc Tukey’s HSD test (two‑sided; multiplicity‑adjusted P values).

Back to article page