Table 1 Optimization of reaction conditionsa
Entry | [Ni]/reductant | Ligand | CPA | Yield of 3 (%)b | Yield 3’(%)b | er of 3c |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | NiBr2•dme/Zn | L1 | – | 17 | 61 | – |
2 | NiBr2•dme /Mn | L1 | – | <10 | 21 | – |
3 | NiBr2•dme /B2neo2 | L1 | – | 79(74) | Trace | – |
4 | NiBr2•dme /B2pin2 | L1 | – | <10 | Trace | – |
5 | NiBr2•dme/B2cat2 | L1 | – | <10 | Trace | – |
6 | NiBr2•dme/B2neo2 | L2 | – | 70 | Trace | – |
7 | NiBr2•dme/B2neo2 | L3 | – | 74 | Trace | – |
8 | NiBr2•dme/B2neo2 | L4 | – | 64 | Trace | – |
9 | NiBr2•dme/B2neo2 | L5 | – | 61 | Trace | – |
10 | NiBr2•dme/B2neo2 | L6 | – | 57 | Trace | – |
11d | NiBr2•dme/B2neo2 | (S,S)-L7 | – | 62 | Trace | 83:17 |
12d | NiBr2•dme/B2neo2 | (S,S)-L8 | – | <10 | Trace | n.d. |
13d | NiBr2•dme/B2neo2 | (S,S)-L9 | – | 50 | Trace | 74:26 |
14d | NiBr2•dme/B2neo2 | (S,S)-L10 | – | 64 | Trace | 85:15 |
15d | NiBr2•dme/B2neo2 | (S,S)-L11 | – | 47 | Trace | 81:19 |
16d | NiBr2•dme/B2neo2 | (S,S)-L10 | (R)-CPA 1 | 62 | Trace | 90:10 |
17d | NiBr2•dme/B2neo2 | (S,S)-L10 | (R)-CPA 2 | 63(60) | Trace | 97:3 |
18d | NiBr2•dme/B2neo2 | (S,S)-L10 | (S)-CPA 1 | 59 | Trace | 74:26 |
19d | NiBr2•dme/B2neo2 | (S,S)-L10 | (R)-CPA 3 | 57 | Trace | 89:11 |
20d | NiCl2•dme/B2neo2 | (S,S)-L10 | (R)-CPA 2 | 56 | Trace | 90:10 |