Fig. 1: Photocatalytic performance comparison of Tp- and BT-Based COFs for H2O2 synthesis. | Nature Communications

Fig. 1: Photocatalytic performance comparison of Tp- and BT-Based COFs for H2O2 synthesis.

From: Keto-enol tautomerism as dynamic electron/hole traps promote charge carrier separation for hydrogen peroxide photosynthesis

Fig. 1

a A diagram depicting the structural and performance disparity between Tp- and BT-based COFs. b Photocatalytic H2O2 production of eight-group COFs samples in H2O2 synthesis (Conditions: 298 K, Xenon lamp, λ > 420 nm, light intensity of 100 mW cm-2, 10 mg catalyst, 10 mL water, and air flowing). c H2O2 generation activity of TpBpy and BTBpy in pure water. The error bars in c are the standard deviations calculated from measurements of three independent samples across parallel experiments. d H2O2 production rate comparison of various COFs, highlighting the superior performance of TpBpy (Conditions: 298 K, Xenon lamp, λ > 420 nm, light intensity of 100 mW cm−2, 1 mg catalyst, 10 mL water, and air flowing) relative to other reported COFs.

Back to article page