Table 6 Summary of ITT estimates of the impacts of the BFY high-cash gift on family well-being and family processes: interparental relationship quality and parenting quality
Family | Outcome | Hypoth. | Age 1 | Age 2 | Age 3 | Pooled Sample | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Panel 4: Interparental Relationship Quality | |||||||
4 | Co-parenting relationship quality | + | Effect (con. interval) | −0.38 (−0.85, 0.09) | −0.34 (−0.80, 0.12) | −0.34 (−0.73, 0.05) | |
Std. effect | −0.13 | −0.12 | −0.12 | ||||
N (deg. freedom) | 720 (673) | 663 (617) | 1383 (802) | ||||
p-value (WY p-value) | 0.12 (0.36) | 0.15 (0.48) | 0.09 (0.25) | ||||
4 | Romantic Relationship Quality Index | + | Effect (con. interval) | −0.30 (−0.91, 0.32) | −0.32 (−0.81, 0.18) | −0.62 (−1.18, −0.06) | −0.47 (−0.86, −0.08) |
Std. effect | −0.08 | −0.12 | −0.17 | −0.14 | |||
N (deg. freedom) | 572 (525) | 512 (467) | 793 (747) | 1877 (900) | |||
p-value (WY p-value) | 0.34 (0.70) | 0.21 (0.48) | 0.03 (0.03) | 0.02 (0.08) | |||
4 | Ever cut/bruised/seriously hurt by partner | - | Effect (con. interval) | −0.02 (−0.07, 0.02) | 0.01 (−0.01, 0.04) | −0.00 (−0.03, 0.02) | |
Std. effect | −0.08 | 0.12 | 0.02 | ||||
N (deg. freedom) | 572 (525) | 511 (466) | 1083 (770) | ||||
p-value (WY p-value) | 0.35 (0.70) | 0.33 (0.48) | 0.74 (0.75) | ||||
4 | Frequency of arguing | - | Effect (con. interval) | −0.04 (−0.21, 0.14) | 0.11 (−0.04, 0.27) | 0.05 (−0.07, 0.17) | |
Std. effect | −0.04 | 0.13 | 0.06 | ||||
N (deg. freedom) | 566 (519) | 512 (467) | 1078 (766) | ||||
p-value (WY p-value) | 0.67 (0.70) | 0.15 (0.48) | 0.43 (0.68) | ||||
Panel 5: Parenting Quality | |||||||
5 | Parent-Child Activities Index | + | Effect (con. interval) | 0.44 (0.09, 0.79) | 0.43 (0.05, 0.81) | 0.38 (0.05, 0.72) | 0.42 (0.14, 0.70) |
Std. effect | 0.16 | 0.14 | 0.15 | 0.15 | |||
N (deg. freedom) | 929 (882) | 919 (873) | 915 (869) | 2763 (971) | |||
p-value (WY p-value) | 0.01 (0.04) | 0.03 (0.05) | 0.02 (0.05) | 0.00 (0.01) | |||
5 | Parent-child interaction (PICCOLO) | + | Effect (con. interval) | 0.53 (−0.42, 1.48) | 0.53 (−0.42, 1.48) | ||
Std. effect | 0.10 | 0.10 | |||||
N (deg. freedom) | 543 (496) | 543 (542) | |||||
p-value (WY p-value) | 0.28 (0.48) | 0.28 (0.28) | |||||
5 | Spanking discipline strategy | + | Effect (con. interval) | 0.02 (−0.02, 0.06) | −0.05 (−0.10, −0.01) | −0.03 (−0.08, 0.02) | −0.03 (−0.06, 0.01) |
Std. effect | 0.08 | −0.14 | −0.07 | −0.06 | |||
N (deg. freedom) | 596 (549) | 914 (868) | 917 (871) | 2427 (959) | |||
p-value (WY p-value) | 0.40 (0.48) | 0.02 (0.05) | 0.27 (0.27) | 0.14 (0.27) |