Fig. 5: Impact of light on ROS-induced DNA damage repair.
From: Conservation of dark CPD photolyase function in blind cavefish

a Violin plot quantification of immunofluorescence assays of γ-H2AX levels in medaka WT cells transiently treated with 400 µM H2O2 and subsequently left to recover under light-dark cycle (LD) or constant darkness (DD) conditions. Cells were fixed at various timepoints indicated on the x-axis. Mean values of γ-H2AX fluorescence intensity are indicated by black horizontal lines and individual data points (n = 9 biologically independent samples) are shown as black hollow circles. b Cell viability assay of medaka WT cells exposed transiently to H2O2 concentrations from 200 µM to 3000 µM and subsequently left to recover under LD or DD conditions. Mean percentage ± SEM (n = 8 biologically independent samples) of cell viability with respect to untreated cells are indicated on the y-axis, while H2O2 concentrations are denoted on the x-axis. c, d Results of AHM assays of 3T3 and 3T3 CPD cells exposed transiently to a range of H2O2 concentrations from 10 µM to 50 µM, and then allowed to recover under LD or DD conditions. Total numbers of dead and viable cells are plotted as means ± SEM (n = 4 biologically independent samples) normalized in relation to untreated cells (Ctrl) on the y-axis, while H2O2 concentrations are indicated on the x-axis. e, f Cell viability assay of 3T3 and 3T3 CPD cells transiently exposed to a range of H2O2 concentrations from 200 to 3000 µM followed by recovery under LD or DD conditions. Mean percentage ± SEM (n = 8 biologically independent samples) of cell viability with respect to untreated cells is plotted on the y-axis, with H2O2 concentrations on the x-axis. g Cell viability assay of various 3T3 cell clones (3T3, 3T3 CPD, 3T3 CPD W310F, 3T3 CPD W400F) transiently exposed to a range of H2O2 concentrations, from 200 to 3000 µM and subsequently left to recover under DD conditions. Mean percentage ± SEM (n = 8 biologically independent samples) of cell viability with respect to untreated cells is plotted on the y-axis, while H2O2 concentrations are indicated on the x-axis. All assays were performed at least 3 times, independently. For the cell viability assays (b–g), representative data is shown. The statistical test used for (a) is student’s t-test, while the analysis for (b–g) is two-way ANOVA analysis. Statistical differences (P values) are annotated in each panel. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.