Correction to: Nature Communications https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-46839-y, published online 16 April 2024

In the version of the article initially published, Fig. 4d was wrong and incorrectly copied from Fig. 4b; the figure should have appeared as shown below. The correct version of the manuscript was reviewed, and the error was introduced after the peer review process was complete. The original article has been corrected.