Fig. 2: Qualitative and quantitative identifications of the intracavity losses. | Nature Communications

Fig. 2: Qualitative and quantitative identifications of the intracavity losses.

From: Boosting silica micro-rod Q factor to 8.28 × 109 for fully stabilizing a soliton microcomb

Fig. 2

a Normalized transmission of different input power with the same scan speed 792 MHz/s, showcasing the absorption-based thermal broadening. b Linear fitting of the triangle’s full width at half maximum (FWHM) as a function of input power Pin, with a fitted slope dΔf/dPin of 7.01 MHz/mW. The vertical error bars give standard deviations in repeated measurements. c Measured Qabs in 10 individual samples. d Atomic force microscope (AFM) image shows a root-mean-square (RMS) roughness of 11.2 nm, within a surface inhomogeneity coefficient (B) of 7.84 nm. e Calculated Qsca, here the red dot illustrates the experimental case. f Measured Qsca of 10 individual samples. g Electrical field distribution of a WGM microcavity, with diameter of 0.1 mm and a 1 nm thick water layer. h Calculated Qcont versus thickness of water layer, in microcavities with diverse diameters. i Qcont of 10 individual samples, which are achieved from the measured results 1/Qcont = 1/Q0-1/Qabs-1/Qsca-1/Qrad.

Back to article page