Fig. 4: In silico manipulations of sensory-evoked cortical output. | Nature Communications

Fig. 4: In silico manipulations of sensory-evoked cortical output.

From: Thalamus enables active dendritic coupling of inputs arriving at different cortical layers

Fig. 4

a Simulation examples for the example model in Fig. 3a–c show how in silico manipulations affect sensory-evoked responses with 1 AP (top row) and bursts of 2 (center) or 3 APs (bottom). From left to right: no manipulation (i.e., control), we deprived PTs from any indirect sensory input via TC-driven neurons in vS1 (i.e., responses are evoked solely by direct sensory input via the TC→PT pathway; manipulation 1), we deprived PTs from any direct sensory input via the TC→PT pathway (i.e., responses are evoked solely indirect sensory input via TC-driven neurons in vS1; manipulation 2), we deprived PTs from the active properties of their apical dendrites (i.e., PTs could not generate Ca2+ APs; manipulation 9). b Model consensus from all 20,359 model configurations which exhibit burst responses: both types of bursts require direct sensory input from the thalamus (left), whereas bursts of 3 APs, but not bursts of 2 APs, require the active properties of the apical dendrites (right). Box plots represent medians and 25th to 75th percentiles. Whiskers extend to the full range of the data. c Model consensus from manipulation 10 (i.e., we deprived PT models from direct sensory input at different distances from the soma): both types of bursts require direct sensory input to basal dendrites, whereas bursts of 3 APs, but not bursts of 2 APs, also require direct sensory input to apical dendrites – in particular around the primary BP. Shadings represent the 25th to 75th percentiles, bold lines represent the medians. Source data for panels (b, c) are provided in the Source Data file.

Back to article page