Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Nature Communications
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. nature communications
  3. articles
  4. article
A new highly oxygen-deficient and cubic Pr3ZrO8-δ for intermediate-temperature thermochemical production of oxygen and hydrogen
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 23 February 2026

A new highly oxygen-deficient and cubic Pr3ZrO8-δ for intermediate-temperature thermochemical production of oxygen and hydrogen

  • Jiaxin Lu1,
  • Yongliang Zhang1,
  • Luhong Chen2,
  • Yan Chen3,
  • Ke An  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-6093-429X3,
  • Yasser Shoukry4,
  • Xinfang Jin4,
  • Zhi-Hao Wang  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-6376-65195,
  • Sai Mu  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-2608-89585,
  • Xueling Lei  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-2482-37282 &
  • …
  • Kevin Huang  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-1232-45931 

Nature Communications , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Electrocatalysis
  • Energy
  • Thermoelectric devices and materials

Abstract

Two-step thermochemical cycles offer a clean route for hydrogen and oxygen production but are typically limited to high temperatures exceeding 1500 °C. Lowering operating temperatures would enable the use of alternative heat sources such as industrial waste heat. Here, we report Pr3ZrO8 as a new enabling material for efficient intermediate-temperature redox cycling, with thermal reduction at 900 °C in argon and steam oxidation at 400 °C. Pr3ZrO8 adopts a face-centered cubic structure similar to CeO2 but exhibits significantly greater oxygen deficiency, achieving average oxygen and hydrogen fluxes of 331.7 and 70.3 µmol·g-1, respectively, over ten cycles at 20%H₂O. These values surpass those of leading CeO2₋δ and perovskite oxides under comparable or more severe conditions. In-situ neutron and X-ray diffraction determine the phase stability boundaries of Pr3ZrO8, while density functional theory identifies O-H bond cleavage as the rate-limiting step. These results establish Pr3ZrO8 as a promising material for intermediate-temperature thermochemical oxygen and hydrogen production.

Data availability

The experimental data generated in this study have been deposited in Zenodo (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17427370) for easy access. Data are available from the corresponding authors upon request.

References

  1. Oni, A., Anaya, K., Giwa, T., Di Lullo, G. & Kumar, A. Comparative assessment of blue hydrogen from steam methane reforming, autothermal reforming, and natural gas decomposition technologies for natural gas-producing regions. Energy Convers. Manag. 254, 115245 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Soltani, S. M. et al. Sorption-enhanced steam methane reforming for combined CO2 capture and hydrogen production: a state-of-the-art review. Carbon Capture Sci. Technol. 1, 100003 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hassan, Q., Tabar, V. S., Sameen, A. Z., Salman, H. M. & Jaszczur, M. A review of green hydrogen production based on solar energy; techniques and methods. Energy Harvest. Syst. 11, 20220134 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Song, H., Luo, S., Huang, H., Deng, B. & Ye, J. Solar-driven hydrogen production: recent advances, challenges, and future perspectives. ACS Energy Lett. 7, 1043–1065 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Budama, V. K., Duarte, J. P. R., Roeb, M. & Sattler, C. Potential of solar thermochemical water-splitting cycles: a review. Sol. Energy 249, 353–366 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kromer, M., Roth, K., Takata, R. & Chin, P. Support for cost analyses on solar-driven high temperature thermochemical water-splitting cycles. TIAX LLLC Rep. D. 535, 2011 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Stechel, E. B., Wexler, R., Gopalakrishnan, S. G. & Carter, E. A. Mixed ionic electronic conducting quaternary Perovskites: materials by Design for Solar Thermochemical Hydrogen. (Arizona State University, 2024).

  8. He, J. et al. Transformation of methane to propylene: a two-step reaction route catalyzed by modified CeO2 nanocrystals and zeolites. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 51, 2438–2442 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Li, L. & Yan, B. CeO2–Bi2O3 nanocomposite: two step synthesis, microstructure and photocatalytic activity. J. Non-Crystalline Solids 355, 776–779 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Meng, Q.-L., Lee, C. -i, Ishihara, T., Kaneko, H. & Tamaura, Y. Reactivity of CeO2-based ceramics for solar hydrogen production via a two-step water-splitting cycle with concentrated solar energy. Int. J. Hydrog. energy 36, 13435–13441 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Xing, Z., Hua, W., Yonggang, W., Kongzhai, L. & Cheng, X. Hydrogen and syngas production from two-step steam reforming of methane over CeO2-Fe2O3 oxygen carrier. J. Rare Earths 28, 907–913 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jiang, Y. et al. Enhanced oxygen vacancies to improve ethyl acetate oxidation over MnOx-CeO2 catalyst derived from MOF template. Chem. Eng. J. 371, 78–87 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Zhu, X., Wang, H., Wei, Y., Li, K. & Cheng, X. Hydrogen and syngas production from two-step steam reforming of methane using CeO2 as oxygen carrier. J. Nat. gas. Chem. 20, 281–286 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fernández-Torre, D., Carrasco, J., Ganduglia-Pirovano, M. V. & Pérez, R. Hydrogen activation, diffusion, and clustering on CeO2 (111): a DFT+ U study. J. Chem. Phys. 141, 014703 (2014).

  15. Wexler, R. B., Stechel, E. B. & Carter, E. A. Materials design directions for solar thermochemical water splitting. Solar Fuels 1–63 (2023).

  16. Jerndal, E., Mattisson, T. & Lyngfelt, A. Thermal analysis of chemical-looping combustion. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 84, 795–806 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  17. García-Labiano, F., de Diego, L. F., Adánez, J., Abad, A. & Gayán, P. Temperature variations in the oxygen carrier particles during their reduction and oxidation in a chemical-looping combustion system. Chem. Eng. Sci. 60, 851–862 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kronberger, B., Lôffler, G. & Hofbauer, H. Simulation of mass and energy balances of a chemical-looping combustion system. Int. J. Energy Clean Environ. 6, 1–14 (2005).

  19. Abanades, S. et al. Investigation of reactive cerium-based oxides for H2 production by thermochemical two-step water-splitting. J. Mater. Sci. 45, 4163–4173 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kaneko, H. et al. Reactive ceramics of CeO2–MOx (M= Mn, Fe, Ni, Cu) for H2 generation by two-step water splitting using concentrated solar thermal energy. Energy 32, 656–663 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gokon, N., Suda, T. & Kodama, T. Oxygen and hydrogen productivities and repeatable reactivity of 30-mol%-Fe-, Co-, Ni-, Mn-doped CeO2− δ for thermochemical two-step water-splitting cycle. Energy 90, 1280–1289 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Carvalho, F. L., Asencios, Y. J., Bellido, J. D. & Assaf, E. M. Bio-ethanol steam reforming for hydrogen production over Co3O4/CeO2 catalysts synthesized by one-step polymerization method. Fuel Process. Technol. 142, 182–191 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kang, K.-S. et al. Redox cycling of CuFe2O4 supported on ZrO2 and CeO2 for two-step methane reforming/water splitting. Int. J. Hydrog. energy 35, 568–576 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kaneko, H., Taku, S. & Tamaura, Y. Reduction reactivity of CeO2–ZrO2 oxide under high O2 partial pressure in two-step water splitting process. Sol. Energy 85, 2321–2330 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Sadi, F., Duprez, D., Gérard, F. & Miloudi, A. Hydrogen formation in the reaction of steam with Rh/CeO2 catalysts: a tool for characterising reduced centres of ceria. J. Catal. 213, 226–234 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Charvin, P., Abanades, S., Lemont, F. & Flamant, G. Experimental study of SnO2/SnO/Sn thermochemical systems for solar production of hydrogen. AIChE J. 54, 2759–2767 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Bhosale, R. R. Solar hydrogen production via ZnO/Zn based thermochemical water splitting cycle: effect of partial reduction of ZnO. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 46, 4739–4748 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Bishop, S. R., Tuller, H. L., Kuru, Y. & Yildiz, B. Chemical expansion of nonstoichiometric Pr0. 1Ce0. 9O2− δ: correlation with defect equilibrium model. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 31, 2351–2356 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Marrocchelli, D., Bishop, S. R., Tuller, H. L., Watson, G. W. & Yildiz, B. Charge localization increases chemical expansion in cerium-based oxides. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 14, 12070–12074 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Chen, D., Cao, Y., Weng, D. & Tuller, H. L. Defect and transport model of Ceria–Zirconia Solid solutions: Ce0. 8Zr0. 2O2− δ an electrical conductivity study. Chem. Mater. 26, 5143–5150 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Treu, B. L., Fahrenholtz, W. & O’Keefe, M. Thermal decomposition behavior of praseodymium oxides, hydroxides, and carbonates. Inorg. Mater. 47, 974–978 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Panlener, R., Blumenthal, R. & Garnier, J. A thermodynamic study of nonstoichiometric cerium dioxide. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 36, 1213–1222 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Ogasawara, H., Kotani, A., Okada, K. & Thole, B. Theory of x-ray-absorption spectra in PrO2 and some other rare-earth compounds. Phys. Rev. B 43, 854 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Tran, F., Blaha, P. & Schwarz, K. Band gap calculations with Becke–Johnson exchange potential. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 19, 196208 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Bulfin, B. et al. Oxidation and reduction reaction kinetics of mixed cerium zirconium oxides. J. Phys. Chem. C. 120, 2027–2035 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Bonk, A. et al. The effect of dopants on the redox performance, microstructure and phase formation of ceria. J. Power Sour. 300, 261–271 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Hao, Y., Yang, C.-K. & Haile, S. M. Ceria–Zirconia Solid Solutions (Ce1–x Zr x O2− δ, x≤ 0.2) for solar thermochemical water splitting: a thermodynamic study. Chem. Mater. 26, 6073–6082 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Scheffe, J. R. & Steinfeld, A. Thermodynamic analysis of cerium-based oxides for solar thermochemical fuel production. Energy Fuels 26, 1928–1936 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Chatzichristodoulou, C. & Hendriksen, P. V. Oxygen nonstoichiometry and defect chemistry modeling of Ce0. 8Pr0. 2O2−. J. Electrochem. Soc. 157, B481 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Chen, D., Bishop, S. R. & Tuller, H. L. Praseodymium-cerium oxide thin film cathodes: study of oxygen reduction reaction kinetics. J. Electroceram. 28, 62–69 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Muhich, C. & Steinfeld, A. Principles of doping ceria for the solar thermochemical redox splitting of H2O and CO2. J. Mater. Chem. A 5, 15578–15590 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Jacot, R., Moré, R., Michalsky, R., Steinfeld, A. & Patzke, G. R. Trends in the phase stability and thermochemical oxygen exchange of ceria doped with potentially tetravalent metals. J. Mater. Chem. A 5, 19901–19913 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  43. An, K., Chen, Y. & Stoica, A. D. VULCAN: a “hammer” for high-temperature materials research. Mrs Bull. 44, 878–885 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Lu, J. et al. Understanding Why SrCo0. 9Ta0. 1O3− δ is a Better Perovskite Oxygen Electrocatalyst than BaCo0. 9Ta0. 1O3− δ. J. Phys. Chem. C. 128, 17252–17260 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Tang, Q., Lei, X., Zhang, Y., Lu, J. & Huang, K. Understanding the catalysis of noble metals in reduction of iron oxide by hydrogen: insights from DFT calculations. J. Mater. Chem. A 12, 31459–31466 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Toby, B. H. EXPGUI, a graphical user interface for GSAS. Appl. Crystallogr. 34, 210–213 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Shlyakhtina, A. et al. Effect of Pr3+/Pr4+ ratio on the oxygen ion transport and thermomechanical properties of the pyrochlore and fluorite phases in the ZrO2–Pr2O3 system. Int. J. Hydrog. energy 41, 9982–9992 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Abel, J. et al. Oxygen non-stoichiometry phenomena in Pr 1− x Zr x O 2− y compounds (0.02<x<0.5). Dalton Trans. 43, 15183–15191 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Kresse, G. & Joubert, D. From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. b 59, 1758 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Krukau, A. V., Vydrov, O. A., Izmaylov, A. F. & Scuseria, G. E. Influence of the exchange screening parameter on the performance of screened hybrid functionals. J. Chem. Phys. 125, 224106 (2006).

  52. Heyd, J., Scuseria, G. E. & Ernzerhof, M. Hybrid functionals based on a screened Coulomb potential. J. Chem. Phys. 118, 8207–8215 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Freysoldt, C. et al. First-principles calculations for point defects in solids. Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 253–305 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Freysoldt, C., Neugebauer, J. & Van de Walle, C. G. Fully ab initio finite-size corrections for charged-defect supercell calculations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 016402 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Seifarth, O. et al. Dielectric properties of single crystalline PrO2 (111)/Si (111) heterostructures: amorphous interface and electrical instabilities. J. Appl. Phys. 106, 104105 (2009).

  56. Kresse, G. & Hafner, J. Ab initio molecular dynamics for liquid metals. Phys. Rev. B 47, 558 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Blöchl, P. E. Projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 50, 17953 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Wang, Y., Wisesa, P., Balasubramanian, A., Dwaraknath, S. & Mueller, T. Rapid generation of optimal generalized Monkhorst-Pack grids. Comput. Mater. Sci. 187, 110100 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Grimme, S. Semiempirical GGA-type density functional constructed with a long-range dispersion correction. J. Comput. Chem. 27, 1787–1799 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Wang, V., Xu, N., Liu, J.-C., Tang, G. & Geng, W.-T. VASPKIT: a user-friendly interface facilitating high-throughput computing and analysis using VASP code. Comput. Phys. Commun. 267, 108033 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Kevin Huang would like to thank the South Carolina SmartState Endowment Program for supporting this exploratory work. Xueling Lei thanks the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 12164020) for financial support and the Hefei Advanced Computing Center for computational support. S.M. would like to acknowledge the startup fund from the University of South Carolina. This research used resources at the Spallation Neutron Source, a DOE Office of Science User Facility operated by the Oak Ridge National Laboratory. The beam time was allocated to VULCAN (Y.C. and K.A.) on proposal numbers IPTS-27973 and IPTS-32446. This work also used the Expanse supercomputer at the San Diego Supercomputer Center through allocation PHY230093 (S.M.) from the Advanced Cyberinfrastructure Coordination Ecosystem: Services & Support (ACCESS) program, which is supported by National Science Foundation Grants No. 2138259, No. 2138286, No. 2138307, No. 2137603, and No. 2138296. Open Access funding is made possible by South Carolina SmartState Endowment Program.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mechanical Engineering and SmartState Center for Solid Oxide Fuel Cells, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA

    Jiaxin Lu, Yongliang Zhang & Kevin Huang

  2. Department of Physics, Jiangxi Normal University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China

    Luhong Chen & Xueling Lei

  3. Neutron Scattering Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, USA

    Yan Chen & Ke An

  4. Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Texas at Dallas, Dallas, TX, USA

    Yasser Shoukry & Xinfang Jin

  5. Department of Physics and Astronomy and SmartState Center for Experimental Nanoscale Physics, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA

    Zhi-Hao Wang & Sai Mu

Authors
  1. Jiaxin Lu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yongliang Zhang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Luhong Chen
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yan Chen
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ke An
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Yasser Shoukry
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Xinfang Jin
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Zhi-Hao Wang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Sai Mu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Xueling Lei
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Kevin Huang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

K.H. conceived the concept, designed the experiments and revised manuscript; X.L. analyzed the data and performed writing of the simulation section; L.C. performed DFT calculations; J.L. drafted the manuscript; J.L. and Y.Z. synthesized materials; J.L., Y.C., and K.A. performed VTND and analyzed the data; J.L. conducted other materials characterization, tested TC performance, and analyzed data; Y.S. and X.J. performed defect chemistry modeling; Z.W. and S.M. calculated defect formation energy.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Xueling Lei or Kevin Huang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Transparent Peer Review file

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lu, J., Zhang, Y., Chen, L. et al. A new highly oxygen-deficient and cubic Pr3ZrO8-δ for intermediate-temperature thermochemical production of oxygen and hydrogen. Nat Commun (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-69235-0

Download citation

  • Received: 14 April 2025

  • Accepted: 26 January 2026

  • Published: 23 February 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-69235-0

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Videos
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Editors
  • Journal Information
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editorial Values Statement
  • Journal Metrics
  • Editors' Highlights
  • Contact
  • Editorial policies
  • Top Articles

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • For Reviewers
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Nature Communications (Nat Commun)

ISSN 2041-1723 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing