Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Nature Communications
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. nature communications
  3. articles
  4. article
Non-Markovian relaxation rpectroscopy of fluxonium qubits
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 24 February 2026

Non-Markovian relaxation rpectroscopy of fluxonium qubits

  • Ze-Tong Zhuang1,
  • Dario Rosenstock1 nAff4,
  • Bao-Jie Liu  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-6344-13781,
  • Aaron Somoroff2 nAff5,
  • Vladimir E. Manucharyan  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-5022-94313 &
  • …
  • Chen Wang  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-4488-70561 

Nature Communications , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Quantum information
  • Qubits
  • Surfaces, interfaces and thin films

Abstract

Recent studies have shown that parasitic two-level systems (TLS) in superconducting qubits, which are a leading source of decoherence, can have relaxation times longer than the qubits themselves. However, the standard techniques used to characterize qubit relaxation is only valid for measuring T1 under the Born-Markov approximation and could mask environmental memory effects in practice. Here, we introduce two-timescale relaxometry, a technique to probe the qubit and environment relaxation simultaneously and efficiently. We apply it to high-coherence fluxonium qubits over a frequency range of 0.1-0.4 GHz, and reveal a discrete spectrum of TLS with millisecond lifetimes. Our analysis of the spectrum is consistent with a random distribution of TLS in the aluminum oxide tunnel barrier of the Josephson junction chain of the fluxonium, with a spectral and volumetric density and average electric dipole similar to previous TLS studies at much higher frequencies. Our study suggests that investigating and mitigating TLS in the junction chain is crucial to the development of various types of noise-protected qubits in circuit QED.

Similar content being viewed by others

Dynamics of superconducting qubit relaxation times

Article Open access 17 November 2022

Two-level system hyperpolarization using a quantum Szilard engine

Article 08 June 2023

Path toward manufacturable superconducting qubits with relaxation times exceeding 0.1 ms

Article Open access 09 August 2022

Data availability

The data used to reproduce the plots within the paper have been deposited in the figshare database under accession code doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.30727316.

References

  1. Redfield, A. G. On the theory of relaxation processes. IBM J. Res. Dev. 1, 19–31 (1957).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Shrikant, U. & Mandayam, P. Quantum non-Markovianity: Overview and recent developments. Front. Quant. Sci. Technol. 2 (2023). https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/quantum-science-and-technology/articles/10.3389/frqst.2023.1134583/full.

  3. Aharonov, D., Kitaev, A. & Preskill, J. Fault-tolerant quantum computation with long-range correlated noise. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 050504 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Terhal, B. M. & Burkard, G. Fault-tolerant quantum computation for local non-Markovian noise. Phys. Rev. A 71, 012336 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Paladino, E., Galperin, Y., Falci, G. & Altshuler, B. 1/f noise: Implications for solid-state quantum information. Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 361–418 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Phillips, W. A. Tunneling states in amorphous solids. J. Low. Temp. Phys. 7, 351–360 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Müller, C., Cole, J. H. & Lisenfeld, J. Towards understanding two-level-systems in amorphous solids: insights from quantum circuits. Rep. Prog. Phys. 82, 124501 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Glazman, L. & Catelani, G. Bogoliubov quasiparticles in superconducting qubits. SciPost Phys. Lect.Notes 031. https://doi.org/10.21468/SciPostPhysLectNotes.31 (2021).

  9. Odeh, M. et al. Non-Markovian dynamics of a superconducting qubit in a phononic bandgap. Nat. Phys. 21, 406–411 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gustavsson, S. et al. Suppressing relaxation in superconducting qubits by quasiparticle pumping. Science 354, 1573–1577 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Chen, M., Owens, J. C., Putterman, H., Schäfer, M. & Painter, O. Phonon engineering of atomic-scale defects in superconducting quantum circuits. Sci. Adv. 10, eado6240 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Spiecker, M. et al. Two-level system hyperpolarization using a quantum Szilard engine. Nat. Phys. 19, 1320–1325 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Liu, B.-J., Wang, Y.-Y., Sheffer, T. & Wang, C. Observation of discrete charge states of a coherent two-level system in a superconducting qubit. Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 160602 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Connolly, T. et al. Coexistence of Nonequilibrium Density and Equilibrium Energy Distribution of Quasiparticles in a Superconducting Qubit. Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 217001 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Tuokkola, M. et al. Methods to achieve near-millisecond energy relaxation and dephasing times for a superconducting transmon qubit. Nat. Commun. 16, 5421 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bland, M. P. et al. Millisecond lifetimes and coherence times in 2D transmon qubits. Nature 647, 343–348 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Somoroff, A. et al. Millisecond coherence in a superconducting qubit. Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 267001 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Manucharyan, V. E., Koch, J., Glazman, L. I. & Devoret, M. H. Fluxonium: single Cooper-pair circuit free of charge offsets. Science 326, 113–116 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wang, F. et al. High-coherence fluxonium qubits manufactured with a wafer-scale-uniformity process. Phys. Rev. Appl. 23, 044064 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ding, L. et al. High-fidelity, frequency-flexible two-qubit fluxonium gates with a Transmon coupler. Phys. Rev. X. 13, 031035 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lin, W.-J. et al. 24 days-stable CNOT Gate on Fluxonium qubits with over 99.9% fidelity. PRX Quantum 6, 010349 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Zhang, H. et al. Tunable inductive coupler for high-fidelity gates between fluxonium qubits. PRX Quantum 5, 020326 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Pop, I. M. et al. Coherent suppression of electromagnetic dissipation due to superconducting quasiparticles. Nature 508, 369–372 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hazard, T. et al. Nanowire superinductance Fluxonium qubit. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 010504 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Grünhaupt, L. et al. Granular aluminium as a superconducting material for high-impedance quantum circuits. Nat. Mater. 18, 816–819 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Dumas, M. F. et al. Measurement-induced Transmon ionization. Phys. Rev. X 14, 041023 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Solomon, I. Relaxation processes in a system of two spins. Phys. Rev. 99, 559–565 (1955).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Spiecker, M., Pavlov, A. I., Shnirman, A. & Pop, I. M. Solomon equations for qubit and two-level systems: Insights into non-Poissonian quantum jumps. Phys. Rev. A 109, 052218 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Gardiner, C. Handbook of stochastic methods (Springer, 2004), 3rd edn. Chapter 3, “Markov Process”.

  30. Rivas, A., Huelga, S. F. & Plenio, M. B. Entanglement and non-Markovianity of quantum evolutions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 050403 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Bista, A. et al. Readout-induced leakage of the fluxonium qubit http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.17807 (2025). ArXiv:2501.17807 [quant-ph].

  32. Klimov, P. et al. Fluctuations of energy-relaxation times in superconducting qubits. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 090502 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Burnett, J. J. et al. Decoherence benchmarking of superconducting qubits. npj Quantum Inf. 5, 1–8 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Lisenfeld, J. et al. Observation of directly interacting coherent two-level systems in an amorphous material. Nat. Commun. 6, 6182 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Wang, C. et al. Surface participation and dielectric loss in superconducting qubits. Appl. Phys. Lett. 107, 162601 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Hung, C.-C. et al. Probing hundreds of individual quantum defects in polycrystalline and amorphous alumina. Phys. Rev. Appl. 17, 034025 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Nguyen, L. B. et al. High-Coherence Fluxonium Qubit. Phys. Rev. X 9, 041041 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Bao, F. et al. Fluxonium: an alternative qubit platform for high-fidelity operations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 010502 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Masluk, N. A., Pop, I. M., Kamal, A., Minev, Z. K. & Devoret, M. H. Microwave characterization of Josephson junction arrays: implementing a low loss superinductance. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 137002 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Ranni, A., Havir, H., Haldar, S. & Maisi, V. F. High impedance Josephson junction resonators in the transmission line geometry. Appl. Phys. Lett. 123, 114002 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Gyenis, A. et al. Experimental realization of a protected superconducting circuit derived from the 0-π Qubit. PRX Quantum 2, 010339 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Kalashnikov, K. et al. Bifluxon: Fluxon-parity-protected superconducting qubit. PRX Quantum 1, 010307 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Kou, A. et al. Fluxonium-based artificial molecule with a tunable magnetic moment. Phys. Rev. X. 7, 031037 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Smith, W. et al. Magnifying quantum phase fluctuations with cooper-pair pairing. Phys. Rev. X. 12, 021002 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Nathan, F. et al. Self-correcting GKP qubit and gates in a driven-dissipative circuit. http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.05671 (2024).

  46. Gupta, V. et al. Low loss lumped-element inductors made from granular aluminum. http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.12611 (2024).

  47. Gustavsson, S. et al. Improving quantum gate fidelities by using a qubit to measure microwave pulse distortions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 040502 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Abdurakhimov, L. V. et al. Identification of different types of high-frequency defects in superconducting qubits. PRX Quantum. 3, 040332 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Zhang, H. et al. Universal fast-flux control of a coherent, low-frequency qubit. Phys. Rev. X. 11, 011010 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank E. Dogan for experimental assistance and Y.-Y. Wang for helpful discussions. This research is supported by the US Army Research Office, QC-S5 Program (No. W911-NF-23-10093; Z.-T. Z., D. R., and C. W.) and the US Army Research Office, HiPS Program (No. W911-NF-18-10146; A. S. and V. E. M.). Data analysis is partially supported by the US Department of Energy, Office of Science, National Quantum Information Science Research Centers, Co-design Center for Quantum Advantage under contract DE-SC0012704 (Z.-T. Z., B.-J. L., and C. W.). The planar fluxonium device is designed by T. A. Masum, and it is fabricated and provided by the SQUILL Foundry at MIT Lincoln Laboratory, with funding from the Laboratory for Physical Sciences (LPS) Qubit Collaboratory.

Author information

Author notes
  1. Dario Rosenstock

    Present address: Google Quantum AI, Santa Barbara, CA, USA

  2. Aaron Somoroff

    Present address: SEEQC, Inc., Elmsford, NY, USA

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Physics, University of Massachusetts-Amherst, Amherst, MA, USA

    Ze-Tong Zhuang, Dario Rosenstock, Bao-Jie Liu & Chen Wang

  2. Department of Physics, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA

    Aaron Somoroff

  3. Institute of Physics, Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland

    Vladimir E. Manucharyan

Authors
  1. Ze-Tong Zhuang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dario Rosenstock
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Bao-Jie Liu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Aaron Somoroff
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Vladimir E. Manucharyan
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Chen Wang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Z.-T. Z. carried out the measurements, collected the data, and performed the analysis with the assistance of D. R. and B.-J. L. The experimental protocol was initially developed by D. R. C. W., who conceived and supervised the experiment. The 3D device was fabricated by A. S. under the supervision of V. E. M. Z.-T. Z., B.-J. L. and C. W. wrote the manuscript with input from all authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chen Wang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks Haolin Jin, Martin Spiecker, Uri Vool, and the other anonymous reviewer for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Transparent Peer Review file

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhuang, ZT., Rosenstock, D., Liu, BJ. et al. Non-Markovian relaxation rpectroscopy of fluxonium qubits. Nat Commun (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-69910-2

Download citation

  • Received: 23 May 2025

  • Accepted: 10 February 2026

  • Published: 24 February 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-69910-2

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Videos
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Editors
  • Journal Information
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editorial Values Statement
  • Journal Metrics
  • Editors' Highlights
  • Contact
  • Editorial policies
  • Top Articles

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • For Reviewers
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Nature Communications (Nat Commun)

ISSN 2041-1723 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing