Table 3 Detachment rate and adhesion maintenance of Candida albicans biofilms under flow

From: Candida albicans biofilm development is governed by cooperative attachment and adhesion maintenance proteins

 

Early CDRa

Late CDRa

Early AMSb

Early AMS log2 (fold change) over WT

Late AMSc

Late AMS log2 (fold change) over WT

WT

0.18 (0.01)

0.10 (<0.01)

5.45

 

9.88

 

Δ/Δals1/3

0.22 (0.01)NS

0.17 (<0.01)

4.58NS

NS

5.97

−0.73

Δhyr1

0.23 (0.01)

0.36 (0.01)

4.33

−0.33

2.81

−1.81

Δhwp2

0.34 (0.02)

0.20 (0.01)

2.98

−0.87

5.08

−0.96

Δeap1

0.27 (0.01)

0.28 (0.01)

3.74

−0.54

3.54

−1.48

Δihd1

0.38 (0.01)

0.13 (<0.01)

2.60

−1.07

7.49

−0.40

WT

0.18 (0.01)

0.10 (<0.01)

5.45

 

9.88

 

Δhog1

0.11 (0.01)

0.03 (<0.01)

9.23

0.76

36.76

1.90

Δsfl1

0.04 (<0.01)

0.04 (<0.01)

24.51

2.17

23.20

1.23

WT

0.18 (0.01)

0.10 (<0.01)

5.45

 

9.88

 

Δbcr1

0.41 (0.01)

0.21 (<0.01)

2.47

−1.14

4.71

−1.07

Δefg1

0.20 (0.01)NS

0.20 (<0.01)

5.06NS

NS

4.98

−0.99

Rapamycin

0.13 (0.01)

0.12 (<0.01)

7.70

0.50

8.22

−0.27

WT

0.18 (0.01)

0.10 (<0.01)

5.45

 

9.88

 

Δywp1

0.10 (<0.01)

0.33 (<0.01)

10.40

0.93

3.06

−1.69

  1. Each value represents a best-fit slope of n ≥ 3 experiments, with standard deviation in parentheses. Data was divided into Early (0–5 h) and Late (5–18 h) phases, as many strains displayed an apparent change in rate around 5 h
  2. NS indicates no significant difference between each strain compared to wild-type CAI4 cells. All other values were significant (p < 0.05)
  3. aCell Detachment Rate (CDR) was calculated as the average total detachment rate (average biomass of newly detached cells/mm2/h) divided by the biomass of biofilm. Values indicate the average proportion of biomass that detaches from the biofilm per hour
  4. bAdhesion Maintenance Strength (AMS) was calculated as the inverse of the BDR. Value is reflective of the strength with which a cell remains adhered to the cells or substrate of a biofilm over time