Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

npj Biofilms and Microbiomes
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. npj biofilms and microbiomes
  3. articles
  4. article
Exopolysaccharides of Lactobacillus crispatus mediate key balancing interactions with the vaginal mucosa
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 19 February 2026

Exopolysaccharides of Lactobacillus crispatus mediate key balancing interactions with the vaginal mucosa

  • Vanessa Croatti1,2,
  • Caroline Dricot1,
  • Tom Eilers1,
  • Jelle Dillen1,
  • Tim Van Rillaer1,
  • Eline Cauwenberghs1,
  • Ilke Van Tente1,
  • Sam Bakelants1,
  • Dieter Vandenheuvel1,
  • Camille Allonsius1,
  • Isabel Pintelon3,4,
  • Sofie Thys3,4,
  • Wendy Mensah5,
  • Marina Naldi5,
  • Peter A. Bron1,
  • Stijn Wittouck1,
  • Irina Spacova1,
  • Carola Parolin2,
  • Beatrice Vitali2 &
  • …
  • Sarah Lebeer1 

npj Biofilms and Microbiomes , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Immunology
  • Microbiology

Abstract

Lactobacillus crispatus is a dominant member of the healthy vaginal microbiota, yet the mechanisms by which it modulates host immunity remain poorly defined, in part due to the lack of tractable in vivo models. Here, we integrate bacterial genetics, in vitro epithelial systems, human-derived data and proteomic approach (Olink®) to uncover a critical role for L. crispatus exopolysaccharides (EPS) in shaping the bacteria-vagina interactions. Comparative genomics identified a conserved EPS biosynthetic locus, with the priming glycosyltransferase gene epsE emerging as a regulatory node, in line with its distinct expression in human vaginal samples. Functional disruption of epsE abrogated L. crispatus EPS production and revealed its role for immune modulation. In human vaginal epithelial monolayers, EPS presence enhanced immune-regulatory (LAP TGF-beta-1) and anti-inflammatory (CST5) responses, whereas its absence triggered elevated pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL1β, IL6, IL8) and matrix metalloproteinase (MMP10). In a 3D vaginal organotypic model, EPS increased chemokines (CXCL5, CXCL6) linked to immune surveillance and the presence of the markers was validated in vaginal samples of healthy volunteers. These findings position EPS as a key immunomodulatory structure of L. crispatus, advancing our mechanistic understanding of host-commensal interactions and informing microbiome-based strategies to promote vaginal health.

Similar content being viewed by others

Lactobacillus crispatus S-layer proteins modulate innate immune response and inflammation in the lower female reproductive tract

Article Open access 30 December 2024

Strain-level variation among vaginal Lactobacillus crispatus and Lactobacillus iners as identified by comparative metagenomics

Article Open access 23 March 2025

Vaginal microbiome Lactobacillus crispatus is heritable among European American women

Article Open access 05 August 2021

Data availability

The datasets supporting the findings of this study are available in the European open-access repository Zenodo (https://zenodo.org/) under the accession number https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15388380.

Code availability

The analysis code supporting the findings of this study are available in the European open-access repository Zenodo (https://zenodo.org/) under the accession number https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15388380.

References

  1. France, M., Alizadeh, M., Brown, S., Ma, B. & Ravel, J. Towards a deeper understanding of the vaginal microbiota. Nat. Microbiol. 7, 367–378 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Condori, S. et al. Recent insights into the vaginal microbiota. Micro. Health Dis. 4, e771 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  3. France, M. T. et al. VALENCIA: a nearest centroid classification method for vaginal microbial communities based on composition. Microbiome 8, 166 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Parolin, C. et al. Isolation of Vaginal Lactobacilli and Characterization of Anti-Candida Activity. PloS One 10, e0131220 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ravel, J. et al. Vaginal microbiome of reproductive-age women. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, 4680–4687 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lebeer, S. et al. A citizen-science-enabled catalogue of the vaginal microbiome and associated factors. Nat. Microbiol. 8, 2183–2195 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Avitabile, E. et al. Protective mechanisms of vaginal lactobacilli against sexually transmitted viral infections. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 25, 9168 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Petrova, M. I., Lievens, E., Malik, S., Imholz, N. & Lebeer, S. Lactobacillus species as biomarkers and agents that can promote various aspects of vaginal health. Front. Physiol. 6, 81 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Younes, J. A. et al. Women and their microbes: the unexpected friendship. Trends Microbiol. 26, 16–32 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ahannach, S., Van Hoyweghen, I., Verhoeven, V. & Lebeer, S. Citizen science as an instrument for women’s health research. Nat. Med. 1–10 (2024)

  11. Mahajan, G. et al. Vaginal microbiome-host interactions modeled in a human vagina-on-a-chip. Microbiome 10, 201 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Edwards, V. L. et al. Three-dimensional models of the cervicovaginal epithelia to study host–microbiome interactions and sexually transmitted infections. Pathog. Dis. 80, ftac026 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sengupta, R. et al. The role of cell surface architecture of lactobacilli in host-microbe interactions in the gastrointestinal tract. Mediators Inflamm. 2013, 237921 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Tytgat, H. L. P. & Lebeer, S. The sweet tooth of bacteria: common themes in bacterial glycoconjugates. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. MMBR 78, 372–417 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Badel, S., Bernardi, T. & Michaud, P. New perspectives for Lactobacilli exopolysaccharides. Biotechnol. Adv. 29, 54–66 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Deo, D., Davray, D. & Kulkarni, R. A diverse repertoire of exopolysaccharide biosynthesis gene clusters in lactobacillus revealed by comparative analysis in 106 sequenced genomes. Microorganisms 7, 444 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lebeer, S. et al. Identification of a gene cluster for the biosynthesis of a long, galactose-rich exopolysaccharide in lactobacillus rhamnosus GG and functional analysis of the priming glycosyltransferase. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75, 3554–3563 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Zuo, F. & Marcotte, H. Advancing mechanistic understanding and bioengineering of probiotic lactobacilli and bifidobacteria by genome editing. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 70, 75–82 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Nachtigall, C., Rohm, H. & Jaros, D. Degradation of exopolysaccharides from lactic acid bacteria by thermal, chemical, enzymatic and ultrasound stresses. Foods Basel Switz. 10, 396 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Yasuda, E., Serata, M. & Sako, T. Suppressive effect on activation of macrophages by lactobacillus casei strain shirota genes determining the synthesis of cell wall-associated polysaccharides. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74, 4746 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Remus, D. M. et al. Impact of 4 Lactobacillus plantarum capsular polysaccharide clusters on surface glycan composition and host cell signaling. Microb. Cell Factories 11, 149 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lee, I.-C. et al. Strain-Specific Features of Extracellular Polysaccharides and Their Impact on Lactobacillus plantarum-Host Interactions. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 82, 3959–3970 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lebeer, S., Vanderleyden, J. & De Keersmaecker, S. C. J. Genes and Molecules of Lactobacilli Supporting Probiotic Action. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. MMBR 72, 728–764 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Doerflinger, S. Y., Throop, A. L. & Herbst-Kralovetz, M. M. Bacteria in the vaginal microbiome alter the innate immune response and barrier properties of the human vaginal epithelia in a species-specific manner. J. Infect. Dis. 209, 1989–1999 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Decout, A. et al. Lactobacillus crispatus S-layer proteins modulate innate immune response and inflammation in the lower female reproductive tract. Nat. Commun. 15, 10879 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Manhanzva, M. T. et al. Inflammatory and antimicrobial properties differ between vaginal Lactobacillus isolates from South African women with non-optimal versus optimal microbiota. Sci. Rep. 10, 6196 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Łaniewski, P. & Herbst-Kralovetz, M. M. Bacterial vaginosis and health-associated bacteria modulate the immunometabolic landscape in 3D model of human cervix. npj Biofilms Microbiomes 7, 1–17 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Serebrenik, J. et al. Differences in vaginal microbiota, host transcriptome, and proteins in women with bacterial vaginosis are associated with metronidazole treatment response. J. Infect. Dis. 224, 2094–2104 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Shannon, B. et al. Association of HPV infection and clearance with cervicovaginal immunology and the vaginal microbiota. Mucosal Immunol. 10, 1310–1319 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Wikström, T. et al. Microbial and human transcriptome in vaginal fluid at midgestation: association with spontaneous preterm delivery. Clin. Transl. Med. 12, e1023 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Zeng, Z., Zuo, F. & Marcotte, H. Putative adhesion factors in vaginal lactobacillus gasseri DSM 14869: functional characterization. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 85, e00800–e00819 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Zhang, J. et al. Lactic acid bacteria-derived exopolysaccharide: formation, immunomodulatory ability, health effects, and structure-function relationship. Microbiol. Res. 274, 127432 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Giordani, B. et al. Exopolysaccharides from vaginal lactobacilli modulate microbial biofilms. Microb. Cell Factories 22, 45 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Živković, M. et al. EPS-SJ Exopolisaccharide Produced by the Strain Lactobacillus paracasei subsp. paracasei BGSJ2-8 Is Involved in Adhesion to Epithelial Intestinal Cells and Decrease on E. coli Association to Caco-2 Cells. Front. Microbiol. 7, 286 (2016).

  35. Dertli, E., Mayer, M. J. & Narbad, A. Impact of the exopolysaccharide layer on biofilms, adhesion and resistance to stress in Lactobacillus johnsonii FI9785. BMC Microbiol. 15, 8 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Spacova, I. et al. Development of a live biotherapeutic throat spray with lactobacilli targeting respiratory viral infections. Microb. Biotechnol. 16, 99–115 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Deng, Z. et al. TGF-β signaling in health, disease and therapeutics. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 9, 1–40 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Bauché, D. & Marie, J. C. Transforming growth factor β: a master regulator of the gut microbiota and immune cell interactions. Clin. Transl. Immunol. 6, e136 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Zhang, Z. & Zhan, F. Type 2 cystatins and their roles in the regulation of human immune response and cancer progression. Cancers 15, 5363 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Torres-Poveda, K. et al. Role of IL-10 and TGF-β1 in local immunosuppression in HPV-associated cervical neoplasia. World J. Clin. Oncol. 5, 753–763 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Veena, M. S. et al. Inactivation of the cystatin E/M tumor suppressor gene in cervical cancer. Genes. Chromosomes Cancer 47, 740–754 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Cherne, M. D. et al. Matrix metalloproteinases expressed in response to bacterial vaginosis disrupt the endocervical epithelium, increasing transmigration of HIV. Infect. Immun. 88, e00041–20 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Han, H. et al. Probiotic Lactobacillus plantarum GUANKE effectively alleviates allergic rhinitis symptoms by modulating functions of various cytokines and chemokines. Front. Nutr. 10, 1291100 (2024).

  44. Song, J., Lang, F., Zhao, N., Guo, Y. & Zhang, H. Vaginal lactobacilli induce differentiation of monocytic precursors toward langerhans-like cells: in vitro evidence. Front. Immunol. 9, 2437 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Nori, S. R. C. et al. Profiling of vaginal Lactobacillus jensenii isolated from preterm and full-term pregnancies reveals strain-specific factors relating to host interaction. Microb. Genomics 9, 001137 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  46. van der Veer, C. et al. Comparative genomics of human Lactobacillus crispatus isolates reveals genes for glycosylation and glycogen degradation: implications for in vivo dominance of the vaginal microbiota. Microbiome 7, 49 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Bojar, D. et al. A Useful Guide to Lectin Binding: Machine-Learning Directed Annotation of 57 Unique Lectin Specificities. ACS Chem. Biol. 17, 2993–3012 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Parks, D. H. et al. A complete domain-to-species taxonomy for Bacteria and Archaea. Nat. Biotechnol. 38, 1079–1086 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Eilers, T. et al. Lactobacillus isalae sp. nov., isolated from the female reproductive tract. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 73, 006038 (2023).

  50. Parks, D. H., Imelfort, M., Skennerton, C. T., Hugenholtz, P. & Tyson, G. W. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res. 25, 1043–1055 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Hyatt, D. et al. Prodigal: prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification. BMC Bioinforma. 11, 119 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Wittouck, S., Eilers, T., van Noort, V. & Lebeer, S. SCARAP: scalable cross-species comparative genomics of prokaryotes. Bioinforma. Oxf. Engl. 41, btae735 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Chen, S., Zhou, Y., Chen, Y. & Gu, J. fastp: an ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics 34, i884–i890 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Constantinides, B., Hunt, M. & Crook, D. W. Hostile: accurate decontamination of microbial host sequences. Bioinformatics 39, btad728 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Ma, B. et al. A comprehensive non-redundant gene catalog reveals extensive within-community intraspecies diversity in the human vagina. Nat. Commun. 11, 940 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Patro, R., Duggal, G., Love, M. I., Irizarry, R. A. & Kingsford, C. Salmon provides fast and bias-aware quantification of transcript expression. Nat. Methods 14, 417–419 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Mason, C. K., Collins, M. A. & Thompson, K. Modified electroporation protocol for Lactobacilli isolated from the chicken crop facilitates transformation and the use of a genetic tool. J. Microbiol. Methods 60, 353–363 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Suzuki, S. et al. Cell-bound exopolysaccharides of Lactobacillus brevis KB290: protective role and monosaccharide composition. Can. J. Microbiol. 59, 549–555 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Suzuki, S. et al. Cellular fatty acid composition and exopolysaccharide contribute to bile tolerance in Lactobacillus brevis strains isolated from fermented Japanese pickles. Can. J. Microbiol. 60, 183–191 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Allonsius, C. N. et al. Interplay between Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG and Candida and the involvement of exopolysaccharides. Microb. Biotechnol. 10, 1753–1763 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Croatti, V. et al. Lactobacilli extracellular vesicles: potential postbiotics to support the vaginal microbiota homeostasis. Microb. Cell Factories 21, 237 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Spacova, I., O’Neill, C. & Lebeer, S. Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus GG inhibits infection of human keratinocytes by Staphylococcus aureus through mechanisms involving cell surface molecules and pH reduction. Benef. Microbes 11, 703–715 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Spacova, I. et al. Multifactorial inhibition of Candida albicans by combinations of lactobacilli and probiotic Saccharomyces cerevisiae CNCM I-3856. Sci. Rep. 14, 9365 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Kinlock, B. L., Wang, Y., Turner, T. M., Wang, C. & Liu, B. Transcytosis of HIV-1 through vaginal epithelial cells is dependent on trafficking to the endocytic recycling pathway. PLoS ONE 9, e96760 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Kleerebezem, M. et al. Complete Genome Sequence of Lactobacillus plantarum WCFS1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100, 1990–1995 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  66. D Vos, M. W. Gene cloning and expression in lactic streptococci. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 3, 281–295 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Yanisch-Perron, C., Vieira, J. & Messing, J. Improved M13 phage cloning vectors and host strains: nucleotide sequences of the M13mp18 and pUC19 vectors. Gene 33, 103–119 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  68. Lambert, J. M., Bongers, R. S. & Kleerebezem, M. Cre-lox-based system for multiple gene deletions and selectable-marker removal in Lactobacillus plantarum. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73, 1126–1135 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  69. Kim, Y. H., Han, K. S., Oh, S., You, S. & Kim, S. H. Optimization of technical conditions for the transformation of Lactobacillus acidophilus strains by electroporation. J. Appl. Microbiol. 99, 167–174 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  70. Messing, J. [2] New M13 vectors for cloning. in Methods in Enzymology vol. 101 20–78 (Academic Press, 1983).

  71. Woodcock, D. M. et al. Quantitative evaluation of Escherichia coli host strains for tolerance to cytosine methylation in plasmid and phage recombinants. Nucleic Acids Res. 17, 3469–3478 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  72. Moretti, S. et al. Human inflammatory response of endotoxin affected by particulate matter-bound transition metals. Environ. Pollut. 244, 118–126 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  73. Jacobsen, A. V., Yemaneab, B. T., Jass, J. & Scherbak, N. Reference gene selection for qPCR is dependent on cell type rather than treatment in colonic and vaginal human epithelial cell lines. PLoS ONE 9, e115592 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  74. Styrczewska, M. et al. Flax fiber hydrophobic extract inhibits human skin cells inflammation and causes remodeling of extracellular matrix and wound closure activation. BioMed. Res. Int. 2015, 862391 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  75. Koerdt, S. et al. Lymph node management in the treatment of oral cancer: analysis of a standardized approach. J. Cranio-Maxillo-fac. Surg. Publ. Eur. Assoc. Cranio-Maxillo-fac. Surg. 44, 1737–1742 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  76. Shi, Y.-J., Yang, J. & Yang, W. Mechanistic investigation of immunosuppression in patients with condyloma acuminata. Mol. Med. Rep. 8, 480–486 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Sincere thanks to the Laboratory of Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology team in Belgium, as well as the Benefi cial Microbes lab team in Italy. The following colleagues have provided important support for the study, such as contributing to the Isala project management, strain collection and the logistics of lab, general genetic engineering advise and biosafety: Sarah Ahannach, Isabel Erreygers, Camille Gepts, Ines Tuyaerts, Nele Van Vliet and Max Dekeukeleire. All the icons and schematic images were created with BioRender.com (full license). This work was supported by the European Research Council grant Lacto-Be (grant ID 852600) (awarded to SL and supports TE, JD) and proof-of-concept VALERIE (Horizon) (grant ID 101213306) (awarded to SL, supports JD) and ERC Runner-up ELLA (grant ID G0ATZ25N), FWO (G049022N, G031222N, SBO DeVeniR S006424N), the Inter-University Special Research Fund of Flanders (iBOF) for the POSSIBL project and the industrial research fund UAntwerpen for IOF POC project CRUCIAL. In addition, IS was supported by the University of Antwerp BOF-KP grant 53399, SW by a FWO postdoctoral grant 12AZ624N and CD by FWO doctoral grant 1S28622N. VC doctoral scholarship and part of the experimental activities were carried out in the Benefi cial Microbes laboratory of the University of Bologna (Italy) and supported by the Italian Ministry of University and Research. The microscopes used in this publication, i.e. Tecnai Spirit G2 Biotwin (AUHA-08-004), Nikon SoRA (I003420N), were funded by Medium-scale research infrastructure grants of the FWO.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Laboratory of Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (LAMB), Department of Bioscience Engineering, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium

    Vanessa Croatti, Caroline Dricot, Tom Eilers, Jelle Dillen, Tim Van Rillaer, Eline Cauwenberghs, Ilke Van Tente, Sam Bakelants, Dieter Vandenheuvel, Camille Allonsius, Peter A. Bron, Stijn Wittouck, Irina Spacova & Sarah Lebeer

  2. Beneficial Microbes Laboratory, Department of Pharmacy and Biotechnology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy

    Vanessa Croatti, Carola Parolin & Beatrice Vitali

  3. Laboratory of Cell Biology and Histology, Faculty of Pharmaceutical, Biomedical and Veterinary Sciences, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium

    Isabel Pintelon & Sofie Thys

  4. Antwerp Centre for Advanced Microscopy (ACAM), University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium

    Isabel Pintelon & Sofie Thys

  5. Bio-Pharmaceutical and Pharmaceutical Analysis, Department of Pharmacy and Biotechnology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy

    Wendy Mensah & Marina Naldi

Authors
  1. Vanessa Croatti
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Caroline Dricot
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Tom Eilers
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jelle Dillen
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Tim Van Rillaer
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Eline Cauwenberghs
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Ilke Van Tente
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Sam Bakelants
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Dieter Vandenheuvel
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Camille Allonsius
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Isabel Pintelon
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Sofie Thys
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Wendy Mensah
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Marina Naldi
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Peter A. Bron
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Stijn Wittouck
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Irina Spacova
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  18. Carola Parolin
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  19. Beatrice Vitali
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  20. Sarah Lebeer
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: V.C., C.D., T.E., D.V., C.A., I.P., S.T., W.M., M.N., P.A.B., I.S., C.P., B.V., and S.L. Performed the experiments: V.C., C.D., S.B., I.P., S.T., W.M., and M.N. Analyzed the data: V.C., C.D., T.E., J.D., T.V.R., D.V., I.P., S.T., W.M., M.N., I.S., C.P., B.V., and S.L. Contributed materials/analysis tools: V.C., C.D., T.E., J.D., T.V.R., E.C., I.V.T., I.P., S.T., S.W., W.M., M.N., P.A.B., I.S., C.P., B.V., and S.L. Wrote the paper: V.C., T.E., T.V.R., I.V.T., I.P., S.T., W.M., M.N., P.A.B., and S.L. Revised the paper: V.C., C.D., T.E., J.D., T.V.R., E.C., I.V.T., S.B., D.V., C.A., I.P., S.T., W.M., M.N., P.A.B., S.W., I.S., C.P., B.V., and S.L. Funding acquisition and project management: B.V. and S.L.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sarah Lebeer.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

S.L. serves as Guest Editor of npj Biofilms and Microbiomes but had no involvement in the peer review process or the decision to publish this paper. S.L. declares no financial competing interests. She is a voluntary academic board member of the International Scientific Association on Probiotics and Prebiotics (ISAPP, www.isappscience.org) and scientific advisor for Freya Biosciences, and declares research funding from YUN, Bioorg, Puratos, Lesaffre/Gnosis, DSM i-Health & dsm-firmenich (not directly involved in the content of this work). DSM i-Health & br/dsm-firmenich provided funding for the collection of human samples used as a reference in this work. I.S. has received funding from ISAPP and the International Probiotics Association (IPA) to attend conferences. P.A.B. is an independent consultant for several companies in the food and pharmaceutical industry bound by confidentiality agreements. B.V. has scientific collaborations with SACCO System and DEPOFARMA and is a scientific consultant for EOS2021. J.D. and S.L. are co-inventors on a patent application on L. crispatus AMBV-0815 related to its unique antimicrobial peptide production. This patent application is not directly linked to the content of this paper, with EPS being a more conserved immunomodulatory property.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Croatti, V., Dricot, C., Eilers, T. et al. Exopolysaccharides of Lactobacillus crispatus mediate key balancing interactions with the vaginal mucosa. npj Biofilms Microbiomes (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41522-026-00937-5

Download citation

  • Received: 08 August 2025

  • Accepted: 05 February 2026

  • Published: 19 February 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41522-026-00937-5

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Content types
  • Journal Information
  • About the Editors
  • Open Access
  • Contact
  • Calls for Papers
  • Article Processing Charges
  • Editorial policies
  • Journal Metrics
  • About the Partner

Publish with us

  • For Authors and Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

npj Biofilms and Microbiomes (npj Biofilms Microbiomes)

ISSN 2055-5008 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing Microbiology

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Microbiology newsletter — what matters in microbiology research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Microbiology