Table 3 Associations between treatments and mutations in ER + /HER2-cohort

From: Unraveling the clinicopathological features driving the emergence of ESR1 mutations in metastatic breast cancer

Treatment

All patients (113)

ESR1 mutant (34)

ESR1 WT (79)

p-values

PIK3CA mutant (36)

PIK3CA WT (77)

p-values

Neo/adj chemotherapy

 Yes

68 (60.2%)

24 (70.6%)

44 (55.7%)

0.15

20 (55.6%)

48 (62.3%)

0.54

 No

45 (39.8%)

10 (29.4%)

35 (44.3%)

16 (44.4%)

29 (37.7%)

Chemotherapy in metastatic disease

 Yes

61 (54.0%)

23 (67.6%)

38 (48.1%)

0.067

19 (52.8%)

42 (54.5%)

1.00

 No

52 (46.0%)

11 (32.4%)

41 (51.9%)

17 (47.2%)

35 (45.5%)

Palbociclib

 Yes

23 (20.4%)

2 (5.9%)

21 (26.6%)

0.011

5 (13.9%)

18 (23.4%)

0.32

 No

90 (79.6%)

32 (94.1%)

58 (73.4%)

31 (86.1%)

59 (76.6%)

Everolimus

 Yes

16 (14.2%)

7 (20.6%)

9 (11.4%)

0.24

4 (11.1%)

12 (15.6%)

0.77

 No

97 (85.8%)

27 (79.4%)

70 (88.6%)

32 (88.9%)

65 (84.4%)