Table 2 Abstracted tumour size and accuracy of MRI measurements.
Study | Menell | Esserman | Kumar | Ornesti | Marcotte-Bloch | Leung | Allen | Vander- walde | Shin | Baur | Mun | Gruber | Pickles | Rahbara | Rominger | Baek | Daniel | Brennan | Preibsch | Song | Sanderink | Shiraishi | Total/ Mean | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Study publication year | 2005 | 2006 | 2006 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2010 | 2010 | 2012 | 2013 | 2013 | 2013 | 2015 | 2015 | 2015 | 2017 | 2017 | 2017 | 2019 | 2020 | 2020 | 2020 | NA | |
DCIS measured in MRI (N) | 34 | 45 | 45 | 16 | 32 | 9 | 64 | 9 | 88 | 58 | 78 | 15 | 26 | 19 | 10 | 55 | 244 | 16 | 123 | 50 | 46 | 164 | 1247 | |
Mean MRI size [mm (SD)] | – | – | 47.6 | 31.1 (4.4) | 28.1 (20.8) | 27.4 (21.2) | – | 6.4 (8.8) | 31.7 (21.3) | 43.6 | – | – | 49.6 (26.8) | 18.2 | – | 23 (17) | 25.3 (18.4) | 42.3 (19.0) | – | 25.8 (15.5) | 19.2 (10.5) | – | 29.6b (9.1) | |
Mean pathological size [mm (SD)] | – | – | 32.4 | 18.2 (4.9) | 25.6 (20.0) | 18.0 (11.1) | – | 28.3 (28.8) | 30.5 (20.1) | 39.1 | – | – | 50.6 (34.2) | 14.1 | – | 20 (18) | 18.8 (13.6) | 58.2 (35.0) | 39.6 | 25.0 (18.0) | 21.8 (17.5) | 38 | 24.5b (10.0) | |
Accuracy | Overestimation (%) | – | 23.0 | – | 50.0 | 21.0 | – | 46.5 | – | – | 42.3 | – | – | – | – | 30.0 | 18.2 | 29.5 | 37.5 | – | 32.0 | 26.1 | 12.0 | 27.3b (10.8) |
Accurate (%) | – | 68.0 | – | 50.0 | 60.0 | – | 34.9 | – | – | 26.9 | – | – | – | – | 50.0 | 72.7 | 61.1 | 56.3 | – | 36.0 | 47.8 | 61.5 | 54.9b (13.0) | |
Underestimation (%) | – | 9.0 | – | 0.0 | 19.0 | – | 18.6 | – | – | 30.8 | – | – | – | – | 20.0 | 9.1 | 9.4 | 6.2 | – | 32.0 | 26.1 | 26.5 | 17.8b (9.2) | |
Margin of error (mm)c | – | – | – | 5 | 5 | – | 1 | – | – | 10 | – | – | – | – | 10 | 10 | 10 | 20 | – | 5 | 5 | 10 | NA | |
Correlation coefficient | – | 0.55 | – | – | 0.83 | – | – | – | – | 0.74 | – | 0.74 | – | 0.66 | – | 0.74 | 0.41 | 0.42 | – | 0.62 | – | 0.69 | NA | |
