Table 1 Using various pure structural representations or physical signatures to classify the highest 5% (denoted as H-Eact problem) and lowest 5% Eact atoms (L-Eact problem) of the combined Eact spectrum merged from six MGs (Fig. 1b).
Representation | Feature number* | H-Eact | L-Eact |
---|---|---|---|
Interstice distribution | 80 | 0.942 ± 0.004 | 0.888 ± 0.012 |
<0, 0, 12, 0, 0 > + <0, 0, 12, 4, 0 > (baseline 1) | 2 | 0.673 ± 0.010 | 0.557 ± 0.006 |
Voronoi index (baseline 2) | 5 | 0.750 ± 0.009 | 0.628 ± 0.016 |
A group of SRO features | 18 | 0.807 ± 0.010 | 0.634 ± 0.017 |
SRO + MRO features | 72 | 0.908 ± 0.005 | 0.801 ± 0.011 |
Radial symmetry functions | 70a | 0.905 ± 0.008 | 0.770 ± 0.009 |
Bispectrum coefficients | 30b | 0.901 ± 0.008 | 0.761 ± 0.010 |
Moment tensor potential (MTP)c | 288d | 0.918 ± 0.008 | 0.784 ± 0.011 |
Smooth-overlap of atomic positions (SOAP) | 567e | 0.927 ± 0.007 | 0.812 ± 0.011 |
Flexibility volume, Vflex | 1 | 0.845 ± 0.009 | 0.784 ± 0.010 |
Atomic shear moduli, G | 1 | 0.690 ± 0.012 | 0.629 ± 0.013 |
Coarse-grained G | 1 | 0.736 ± 0.014 | 0.674 ± 0.015 |