Table 3 Six alloys recommended by Bayesian sampling and experimental results.
Alloy No. | Composition | UTS (MPa) | Elongation (%) | Y(MPa) | Improvement (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
S1-POI | \({{\rm{Sn}}}_{94.8}{{\rm{Ag}}}_{3.8}{{\rm{Cu}}}_{0.7}{{\rm{Bi}}}_{0.5}{{\rm{Zn}}}_{0.2}\) | 56.57 ± 4.14 | 31.45 ± 0.99 | 1779 ± 142 | 20.31 |
S1-EI | \({{\rm{Sn}}}_{94.7}{{\rm{Ag}}}_{3.8}{{\rm{Cu}}}_{0.7}{{\rm{Bi}}}_{0.5}{{\rm{Zn}}}_{0.2}{{\rm{Ti}}}_{0.1}\) | 52.00 ± 0.96 | 29.34 ± 2.59 | 1526 ± 123 | 3.17 |
S2-POI | \({{\rm{Sn}}}_{90.8}{{\rm{Ag}}}_{3.8}{{\rm{Cu}}}_{0.7}{{\rm{Bi}}}_{3}{{\rm{In}}}_{1.5}{{\rm{Ti}}}_{0.2}\) | 79.68 ± 1.23 | 21.93 ± 0.50 | 1747 ± 166 | 19.28 |
S2-EI | \({{\rm{Sn}}}_{90.5}{{\rm{Ag}}}_{3.8}{{\rm{Cu}}}_{0.7}{{\rm{Bi}}}_{2.5}{{\rm{In}}}_{1.5}{{\rm{Ti}}}_{0.3}{{\rm{Zn}}}_{0.2}{{\rm{Sb}}}_{0.5}\) | 76.68 ± 2.00 | 19.50 ± 1.83 | 1495 ± 112 | 2.07 |
S3-POI | \({{\rm{Sn}}}_{92.6}{{\rm{Ag}}}_{3.8}{{\rm{Cu}}}_{0.7}{{\rm{Zn}}}_{0.6}{{\rm{Sb}}}_{1.5}{{\rm{In}}}_{0.5}{{\rm{Ti}}}_{0.2}{{\rm{Ni}}}_{0.1}\) | 66.04 ± 1.47 | 24.26 ± 3.33 | 1602 ± 180 | 6.92 |
S3-EI | \({{\rm{Sn}}}_{92.3}{{\rm{Ag}}}_{3.8}{{\rm{Cu}}}_{0.7}{{\rm{Zn}}}_{0.6}{{\rm{Sb}}}_{2}{{\rm{In}}}_{0.5}{{\rm{Ni}}}_{0.1}\) | 63.24 ± 3.98 | 24.00 ± 3.00 | 1518 ± 158 | 1.28 |