Table 3 Size and temperature effects on mechanical properties of TiB2

From: Machine-learning potentials for nanoscale simulations of tensile deformation and fracture in ceramics

No. of atoms

T (K)

Dimensions (nm)

Strength (GPa)

Toughness (GPa)

Fracture strain (%)

  

a

b

c

[0001]

\([10\overline{1}0]\)

\([\overline{1}2\overline{1}0]\)

[0001]

\([10\overline{1}0]\)

\([\overline{1}2\overline{1}0]\)

[0001]

\([10\overline{1}0]\)

\([\overline{1}2\overline{1}0]\)

720

300

1.51

1.58

2.57

52.72

55.01

63.69

4.33

3.11

4.32

22.0

16.0

18.0

12,960 (S1)

300

4.55

4.73

5.15

53.71

51.36

56.40

4.83

2.77

3.38

26.4

14.3

16.8

141,120 (S2)

300

10.63

11.05

10.30

53.69

51.44

56.41

4.81

2.78

3.37

26.4

14.3

16.8

230,400 (S3)

300

12.14

12.63

12.87

53.71

51.43

56.38

4.82

2.78

3.37

26.3

14.3

16.8

432,000 (S4)

300

15.18

15.79

15.45

53.67

51.47

56.42

4.80

2.78

3.37

26.2

14.2

16.8

720

1200

1.53

1.59

2.60

43.87

45.21

51.34

3.27

2.29

3.07

20.0

16.0

16.0

432,000 (S4)

1200

15.26

15.86

15.52

43.27

41.30

44.67

3.45

1.96

2.32

21.6

12.8

14.1

  1. The directional response to strain is assessed for supercells with sizes ranging from the atomic to the nanoscale. The mechanical properties of TiB2 are extracted from ML-MD stress/strain data in Fig. 4.