Fig. 5: Comparison of empirical cumulative distribution functions of Euler angles for two different crystallographic orientation density functions. | npj Computational Materials

Fig. 5: Comparison of empirical cumulative distribution functions of Euler angles for two different crystallographic orientation density functions.

From: Comment on “Machine learning enhanced analysis of EBSD data for texture representation”

Fig. 5

Empirical cumulative distribution functions of Euler angles φ1 (a), Φ (b), and φ2 (c) of 350 crystallographic orientations and φ1 (d), Φ (e), and φ2 (f) of 7000 crystallographic orientations sampled from the crystallographic orientation density functions f1 and f2, respectively.

Back to article page