Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

npj Computational Materials
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. npj computational materials
  3. articles
  4. article
Accurate screening of functional materials with machine-learning potential and transfer-learned regressions: Heusler alloy benchmark
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 19 February 2026

Accurate screening of functional materials with machine-learning potential and transfer-learned regressions: Heusler alloy benchmark

  • Enda Xiao1 &
  • Terumasa Tadano1,2 

npj Computational Materials , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Materials science
  • Physics

Abstract

We present a machine learning-accelerated high-throughput (HTP) workflow for the discovery of functional materials. As a test case, quaternary and all-d Heusler compounds were screened for stable compounds with large magnetocrystalline anisotropy energy (Eaniso). Structure optimization and evaluation of formation energy and energy above the convex hull were performed using the eSEN-30M-OAM interatomic potential, while local magnetic moments, phonon stability, magnetic stability, and Eaniso were predicted by eSEN models trained on our DxMag Heusler database. A frozen transfer learning strategy was employed to improve accuracy. Candidate compounds identified by the ML-HTP workflow were validated with density functional theory, confirming high predictive precision. We also benchmark the performance of different uMLIPs, discuss the fidelity of local magnetic moment prediction, and demonstrate generalization to unseen elements via transfer learning from a universal interatomic potential.

Similar content being viewed by others

A framework to evaluate machine learning crystal stability predictions

Article Open access 23 June 2025

Searching for ductile superconducting Heusler X2YZ compounds

Article Open access 09 August 2023

Machine learned synthesizability predictions aided by density functional theory

Article Open access 12 October 2022

Data availability

The ML-HTP candidate list and DFT validation results are included in the Supplementary Information as Tables S3 and S4. The complete set of all screened compounds, along with ML-predicted properties, will be made available through the HeuslerDB database at https://www.nims.go.jp/group/spintheory/.

Code availability

The developed packages MLIP-HOT and MLIP-FTL will be made available through the Spin Theory Group GitHub repository at https://github.com/nims-spin-theory and our group website at https://www.nims.go.jp/group/spintheory/.

References

  1. Sanvito, S. et al. Accelerated discovery of new magnets in the Heusler alloy family. Sci. Adv. 3, e1602241 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Zhang, H. High-throughput design of magnetic materials. Electron. Struct. 3, 033001 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Barwal, V. et al. Large magnetoresistance and high spin-transfer torque efficiency of Co2MnxFe1−xGe (0 ≤ x ≤ 1) Heusler alloy thin films obtained by high-throughput compositional optimization using combinatorially sputtered composition-gradient film. APL Mater. 12, 111114 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Faleev, S. V. et al. Heusler compounds with perpendicular magnetic anisotropy and large tunneling magnetoresistance. Phys. Rev. Mater. 1, 024402 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hu, K. et al. High-throughput design of Co-based magnetic Heusler compounds. Acta Mater. 259, 119255 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hilgers, R., Wortmann, D. & Blügel, S. Machine Learning-based estimation and explainable artificial intelligence-supported interpretation of the critical temperature from magnetic ab initio Heusler alloys data. Phys. Rev. Mater. 9, 044412 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Baigutlin, D. R., Sokolovskiy, V. V., Buchelnikov, V. D. & Taskaev, S. V. Machine learning algorithms for optimization of magnetocaloric effect in all-d-metal Heusler alloys. J. Appl. Phys. 136, 183903 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mitra, S., Ahmad, A., Biswas, S. & Kumar Das, A. A machine learning approach to predict the structural and magnetic properties of Heusler alloy families. Comput. Mater. Sci. 216, 111836 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Liu, C. et al. Machine learning to predict quasicrystals from chemical compositions. Adv. Mater. 33, 2102507 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Xie, R., Crivello, J.-C. & Barreteau, C. Screening new quaternary semiconductor Heusler compounds by machine-learning methods. Chem. Mater. 35, 7615–7627 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lu, Y., Sun, Y., Hou, C., Li, Z. & Ni, J. Explainable attention CNN for predicting properties of Heusler alloys. J. Phys. Chem. C 129, 14958–14967 (2025).

  12. Xie, T. & Grossman, J. C. Crystal graph convolutional neural networks for an accurate and interpretable prediction of material properties. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 145301 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Choudhary, K. & DeCost, B. Atomistic line graph neural network for improved materials property predictions. npj Comput. Mater. 7, 1–8 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Barroso-Luque, L. et al. Open materials 2024 (OMat24) inorganic materials dataset and models.Preprint at arXiv https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2410.12771 (2024).

  15. Yamada, H. et al. Predicting materials properties with little data using shotgun transfer learning. ACS Cent. Sci. 5, 1717–1730 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lee, J. & Asahi, R. Transfer learning for materials informatics using crystal graph convolutional neural network. Comput. Mater. Sci. 190, 110314 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hoffmann, N., Schmidt, J., Botti, S. & Marques, M. A. L. Transfer learning on large datasets for the accurate prediction of material properties. Digit. Discov. 2, 1368–1379 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  18. He, J., Rabe, K. M. & Wolverton, C. Computationally accelerated discovery of functional and structural Heusler materials. MRS Bull. 47, 559–572 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Noky, J., Zhang, Y., Gooth, J., Felser, C. & Sun, Y. Giant anomalous Hall and Nernst effect in magnetic cubic Heusler compounds. npj Comput. Mater. 6, 1–8 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Xing, G., Masuda, K., Tadano, T. & Miura, Y. Chemical-substitution-driven giant anomalous Hall and Nernst effects in magnetic cubic Heusler compounds. Acta Mater. 270, 119856 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Xiao, E. & Tadano, T. High-throughput computational screening of Heusler compounds with phonon considerations for enhanced material discovery. Acta Mater. 297, 121312 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Xie, Y., Tritsaris, G. A., Grånäs, O. & Rhone, T. D. Data-driven studies of the magnetic anisotropy of two-dimensional magnetic materials. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 12, 12048–12054 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Liao, T. et al. Predicting magnetic anisotropy energies using site-specific spin-orbit coupling energies and machine learning: application to iron-cobalt nitrides. Phys. Rev. Mater. 6, 024402 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Dutta, A. & Sen, P. Machine learning assisted hierarchical filtering: a strategy for designing magnets with large moment and anisotropy energy 10, 3404–3417 (2022).

  25. Fu, X. et al. Learning smooth and expressive interatomic potentials for physical property prediction. Proc. Mach. Learn. Res. 267, 17875–17893 (2025)..

  26. Choudhary, K. et al. Unified graph neural network force-field for the periodic table: Solid state applications. Digit. Discov. 2, 346–355 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Deng, B. et al. CHGNet as a pretrained universal neural network potential for charge-informed atomistic modelling. Nat. Mach. Intell. 5, 1031–1041 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Kim, J. et al. Data-efficient multifidelity training for high-fidelity machine learning interatomic potentials. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 147, 1042–1054 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Yan, K. et al. A materials foundation model via hybrid invariant-equivariant architectures. Preprint at arXiv https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2503.05771 (2025).

  30. Yang, H. et al. MatterSim: a deep learning atomistic model across elements, temperatures and pressures. Preprint at arXiv https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2405.04967 (2024).

  31. Hu, X. et al. Searching high spin polarization ferromagnet in Heusler alloy via machine learning. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 32, 205901 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Miyazaki, H. et al. Machine learning based prediction of lattice thermal conductivity for half-Heusler compounds using atomic information. Sci. Rep. 11, 13410 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Kim, K. et al. Machine-learning-accelerated high-throughput materials screening: Discovery of novel quaternary Heusler compounds. Phys. Rev. Mater. 2, 123801 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Liu, K. et al. Machine learning assisted development of Heusler alloys for high magnetic moment. Comput. Mater. Sci. 250, 113692 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Hirohata, A. et al. Machine learning for the development of new materials for a magnetic tunnel junction. npj Spintron. 3, 1–9 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Jain, A. et al. Commentary: The Materials Project: a materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation. APL Mater. 1, 011002 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Schmidt, J. et al. Machine-learning-assisted determination of the global zero-temperature phase diagram of materials. Adv. Mater. 35, 2210788 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Schmidt, J. et al. Improving machine-learning models in materials science through large datasets. Mater. Today Phys. 48, 101560 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Kim, S. Y., Park, Y. J. & Li, J. Leveraging neural network interatomic potentials for a foundation model of chemistry (2025). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2506.18497 (2025).

  40. Chen, C., Ye, W., Zuo, Y., Zheng, C. & Ong, S. P. Graph networks as a universal machine learning framework for molecules and crystals. Chem. Mater. 31, 3564–3572 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Chang, R., Wang, Y.-X. & Ertekin, E. Towards overcoming data scarcity in materials science: unifying models and datasets with a mixture of experts framework. npj Comput. Mater. 8, 242 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Minami, S. et al. Scaling law of Sim2Real transfer learning in expanding computational materials databases for real-world predictions. npj Comput. Mater. 11, 146 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Sun, W. et al. The thermodynamic scale of inorganic crystalline metastability. Sci. Adv. 2, e1600225 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Saal, J. E., Kirklin, S., Aykol, M., Meredig, B. & Wolverton, C. Materials design and discovery with high-throughput density functional theory: the open quantum materials database (OQMD). JOM 65, 1501–1509 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Bahn, S. & Jacobsen, K. An object-oriented scripting interface to a legacy electronic structure code. Comput. Sci. Eng. 4, 56–66 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Tadano, T. & Tsuneyuki, S. Self-consistent phonon calculations of lattice dynamical properties in cubic SrTiO3 with first-principles anharmonic force constants. Phys. Rev. B 92, 054301 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Tadano, T., Gohda, Y. & Tsuneyuki, S. Anharmonic force constants extracted from first-principles molecular dynamics: applications to heat transfer simulations. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 26, 225402 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Ebert, H., Ködderitzsch, D. & Minár, J. Calculating condensed matter properties using the KKR-Green’s function method—recent developments and applications. Rep. Prog. Phys. 74, 096501 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Liechtenstein, A. I., Katsnelson, M. I., Antropov, V. P. & Gubanov, V. A. Local spin density functional approach to the theory of exchange interactions in ferromagnetic metals and alloys. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 67, 65–74 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Hjorth Larsen, A. et al. The atomic simulation environment—a Python library for working with atoms. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 29, 273002 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Bitzek, E., Koskinen, P., Gähler, F., Moseler, M. & Gumbsch, P. Structural relaxation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 170201 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Chanussot, L. et al. Open Catalyst 2020 (OC20) dataset and community challenges. ACS Catal. 11, 6059–6072, https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.0c04525 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set. Comput. Mater. Sci. 6, 15–50 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169–11186 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Kresse, G. & Joubert, D. From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 59, 1758–1775 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865–3868 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Daalderop, G. H. O., Kelly, P. J. & Schuurmans, M. F. H. First-principles calculation of the magnetocrystalline anisotropy energy of iron, cobalt, and nickel. Phys. Rev. B 41, 11919–11937 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Xing, G., Miura, Y. & Tadano, T. Lattice dynamics and its effects on magnetocrystalline anisotropy energy of pristine and hole-doped YCo5 from first principles. Phys. Rev. B 105, 104427 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Xing, G., Miura, Y. & Tadano, T. First-principles prediction of phase transition of YCo5 from self-consistent phonon calculations. Phys. Rev. B 108, 014304 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Ong, S. P. et al. Python materials genomics (pymatgen): a robust, open-source Python library for materials analysis. Comput. Mater. Sci. 68, 314–319 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Blöchl, P. E., Jepsen, O. & Andersen, O. K. Improved tetrahedron method for Brillouin-zone integrations. Phys. Rev. B 49, 16223–16233 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  62. ASE2SPRKKR software package — ASE2SPRKKR documentation. https://ase2sprkkr.github.io/ase2sprkkr/.

  63. Togo, A., Shinohara, K. & Tanaka, I. Spglib: a software library for crystal symmetry search. Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. Methods 4, 2384822 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study used computational resources of the supercomputer Fugaku provided by the RIKEN Center for Computational Science (Project ID: hp250229), the computer resources provided by ISSP, U-Tokyo under the program of SCCMS, and the computer resources at NIMS Numerical Materials Simulator. This study was supported by MEXT Program: Data Creation and Utilization-Type Material Research and Development Project (Digital Transformation Initiative Center for Magnetic Materials) Grant Number JPMXP1122715503 and as “Program for Promoting Researches on the Supercomputer Fugaku” (Data-Driven Research Methods Development and Materials Innovation Led by Computational Materials Science, JPMXP1020230327).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Research Center for Magnetic and Spintronic Materials, National Institute for Materials Science, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan

    Enda Xiao & Terumasa Tadano

  2. Digital Transformation Initiative Center for Magnetic Materials (DXMag), National Institute for Materials Science, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan

    Terumasa Tadano

Authors
  1. Enda Xiao
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Terumasa Tadano
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

T.T. conceptualized, designed, and supervised the project; reviewed and edited the manuscript. T.T. and E.X. developed the methodology and code implementation; performed the calculations and analysis; E.X. drafted the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Enda Xiao or Terumasa Tadano.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xiao, E., Tadano, T. Accurate screening of functional materials with machine-learning potential and transfer-learned regressions: Heusler alloy benchmark. npj Comput Mater (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524-026-02013-0

Download citation

  • Received: 02 September 2025

  • Accepted: 08 February 2026

  • Published: 19 February 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524-026-02013-0

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Associated content

Collection

Machine Learning Interatomic Potentials in Computational Materials

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Content types
  • Journal Information
  • Open Access
  • About the Editors
  • Contact
  • Editorial policies
  • Journal Metrics
  • About the partner

Publish with us

  • For Authors and Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

npj Computational Materials (npj Comput Mater)

ISSN 2057-3960 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing