Table 2 Comparison between SRL-3 and inverted scans to criterion measures (n = 30)

From: Evaluation of body shape as a human body composition assessment in isolated conditions and remote environments

Outcome

SRL-3 vs DXA R2

SRL-3 vs DXA RMSE

Fit3D vs DXA R2

Fit3D vs DXA RMSE

SRL-3 vs Fit3D R2

SRL-3 vs Fit3D RMSE

SRL-3, standing vs Inverted R2

SRL-3, standing vs Inverted RMSE

Fit3D standing vs SRL-3 Inverted R2

Fit3D standing vs SRL-3 Inverted RMSE

DXA vs SRL-3 Inverted R2

DXA vs SRL-3 Inverted RMSE

Total FM

0.76

2.62

0.77

2.67

0.90

1.72

0.77

1.96

0.70

2.24

0.52

2.84

Total FFM

0.97

2.04

0.96

2.55

0.99

1.18

0.95

2.71

0.95

2.80

0.93

3.23

Percent Fat

0.70

3.42

0.71

4.07

0.91

1.90

0.64

2.87

0.73

2.47

0.50

3.35

VAT

0.78

0.06

0.68

0.07

0.89

0.04

0.43

0.10

0.30

0.11

0.39

0.11

Arm FM

0.54

0.26

0.51

0.28

0.86

0.14

0.64

0.20

0.60

0.21

0.21

0.29

Arm FFM

0.94

0.32

0.95

0.28

0.98

0.16

0.95

0.29

0.97

0.24

0.93

0.34

Leg FM

0.62

0.58

0.69

0.59

0.77

0.45

0.56

0.55

0.38

0.65

0.18

0.75

Leg FFM

0.92

0.62

0.93

0.58

0.98

0.35

0.93

0.51

0.95

0.41

0.86

0.69

Trunk FM

0.81

1.27

0.82

1.23

0.94

0.72

0.78

1.02

0.64

1.29

0.61

1.36

Trunk FFM

0.94

1.50

0.95

1.36

0.98

0.82

0.95

1.21

0.97

0.93

0.94

1.32

  1. FM fat mass, FFM fat-free mass, VAT visceral adipose tissue.
  2. All outcomes are presented in kg except percent fat.