Table 4 Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of combined biomarkers of cognitive impairment in Parkinson’s disease
Ref. | Study design | Included studies (N, design) | Included subjects (N, diagnosis) | Biomarker | Cognitive dysfunction severity | Group comparisons | Main results | Conclusions | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Type | Purpose | ||||||||
MA | N: 57 prospective, cohort | PD-CI (CSF): 1698 PD-CI (EEG): 180 | Neuroimaging (MRI, DAT SPECT); EEG (α, β, δ, θ power); CSF (Aß42; t-tau); genetics (APOE alleles; MAPT H1/H1; GBA mutations) | Prognosis | PD-CI | PD-CI vs PD-NC | APOE ε2 (RR: 6.47; 95% CI: [1.29, 32.53]; p = 0.09) and ε4 alleles (RR: 3.04; 95% CI: [1.88, 4.91]; p = 0.06) are associated with an increased risk of PD-CI Reduced median α power (RR: 1.77; 95% CI: [1.07, 2.92]; p = 0.75) and increased median θ power (RR: 2.93; 95% CI: [1.61, 5.33]; p = 0.92) are associated with an increased risk of PD-CI | APOE alleles and EEG slowing may be promising predictors for PD-CI | |