Table 2 Bivariate correlations between SIPS symptoms and MFT performance in CHR participants.

From: Increased face detection responses on the mooney faces test in people at clinical high risk for psychosis

Ā 

Full CHR sample (n = 37)

Male (n = 15)

Female (n = 22)

SIPS subscale/symptom

Upright

Inverted

Upright

Inverted

Upright

Inverted

Positive symptom subscale

āˆ’0.10

0.03

0.33

0.19

āˆ’0.32

āˆ’0.07

P3 Grandiose ideasa

āˆ’0.17

āˆ’0.07

āˆ’0.45

āˆ’0.27

āˆ’0.21

āˆ’0.17

P4 Perceptual abnormalitiesa

0.16

0.18

0.73*

0.43

āˆ’0.05

0.12

P5 Disorganized communicationa

0.15

0.25

0.23

0.20

0.09

0.26

Negative symptom subscale

0.29

0.28

0.46

0.43

0.28

0.28

Disorganized symptom subscale

0.18

0.20

0.47

0.11

0.08

0.34

  1. CHR clinical high risk, MFT Mooney Faces Test, SIPS Structured Interview for Psychosis-Risk Syndromes.
  2. aSIPS individual item scores were unavailable for 1 male CHR participant.
  3. *p < 0.005.