Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Schizophrenia
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. schizophrenia
  3. articles
  4. article
Efficacy of an emotion-oriented cognitive behavior therapy for delusions (CBTd-E) compared to waitlist in a single-blinded randomized-controlled trial
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 17 February 2026

Efficacy of an emotion-oriented cognitive behavior therapy for delusions (CBTd-E) compared to waitlist in a single-blinded randomized-controlled trial

  • Stephanie Mehl  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-2157-55431,2,
  • Christopher Hautmann  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-5155-37623,
  • Björn Schlier4,5,
  • Laura Marie-Louise Dorn6,
  • Lea Ludwig5,
  • Tobias Teismann7,
  • Michael Franz8,9,
  • Winfried Rief6,
  • Rudolf Stark10 &
  • …
  • Tania Marie Lincoln  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-6674-24405 

Schizophrenia , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 365 Accesses

  • 7 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Human behaviour
  • Psychosis
  • Schizophrenia

Abstract

Psychological interventions for delusions may be enhanced by targeting their presumed causal factors. An emotion-oriented variant of cognitive behavioral therapy for delusions (CBTd-E), designed to target affect regulation and maladaptive schemata, was evaluated for its effect on delusions. A single-blind, multicenter, randomized, waitlist-controlled trial was conducted in three German outpatient clinics. Ninety-four patients with psychotic disorders and persistent delusions were randomized to 25 individual sessions of CBTd-E over 6 months (n = 47) or waitlist (n = 47). CBTd-E included two modules designed to improve affect regulation and maladaptive schemata. Assessments were performed at baseline (T1), three months (T2), and six months (T3). Regression-based analysis of covariance at T3 in the intent-to-treat sample indicated no significant benefit for the CBT-E group in the primary outcome (Psychotic Symptom Rating Scale delusions subscale, d = -0.45 [CI: 0.36; -1.26]). Regarding secondary outcomes, a significant effect favoring CBTd-E was observed in general psychopathology (d = -0.56), but no effects on positive and negative symptoms, depression, general and social functioning, or antipsychotic dosage. Regarding the proposed target mechanisms, we found improved cognitive reappraisal (d = 0.59), worrying (d = -0.52), quality of sleep (d = -0.49), and self-esteem (d = 0.36). Despite its effect on the suggested target mechanisms, affect regulation and maladaptive schemata, and on general psychopathology, this emotion-focused variant of CBT did not show an effect on delusions. A possible avenue to achieve stronger effects on delusions is to personalize the modularized interventions.

Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02787135

Similar content being viewed by others

A systematic review and meta-analysis of transdiagnostic cognitive behavioural therapies for emotional disorders

Article Open access 16 January 2024

Cognitive behavioral therapy skills via a smartphone app for subthreshold depression among adults in the community: the RESiLIENT randomized controlled trial

Article Open access 23 April 2025

Prefrontal and parieto-occipital neural signatures of evidence accumulation and response to computerised Cognitive Behavioural Therapy in depression

Article Open access 14 October 2025

Data availability

Data from the study and all study materials will be available from the corresponding author after a reasonable request.

Code availability

Code for the data analysis of the study will be available from the corresponding author after a reasonable request.

References

  1. Bighelli, I. et al. Psychological interventions to reduce positive symptoms in schizophrenia: systematic review and network meta-analysis. World Psychiatry 17, 316–329 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Turner, D. T. et al. Efficacy and moderators of cognitive behavioural therapy for psychosis vs. other psychological interventions: an individual-participant data meta-analysis. Front. Psychiatry https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020/00402 (2020).

  3. Bighelli, I. et al. Psychosocial and psychological interventions for relapse prevention in schizophrenia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Lancet Psychiatry 8, 969–980 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Turner, D. T., Burger, S., Smit, F., Valmaggia, L. R. & Van der Gaag, M. What constitutes sufficient evidence for case-formulation-driven CBT for psychosis? Cumulative meta-analysis of the effect on hallucinations and delusions. Schizophr. Bull. 46, 1072–1085 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mehl, S., Werner, D. & Lincoln, T. M. Does cognitive behavior therapy for psychosis (CBTp) show a sustainable effect on delusions? A meta-analysis. Front. Psychol. 6, 1450–1459 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kendler, K. S. & Campbell, J. Interventionist causal models in psychiatry: repositioning the mind-body problem. Psychol. Med. 39, 881–887 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Freeman, D. et al. An early Phase II randomised controlled trial testing the effect on persecutory delusions of using CBT to reduce negative cognitions about the self: the potential benefits of enhancing self confidence. Schizophr. Res 160, 186–192 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Freeman, D. et al. Effects of cognitive behaviour therapy for worry on persecutory delusions in patients with psychosis (WIT): a parallel, single-blind, randomised controlled trial with a mediation analysis. Lancet Psychiatry 2, 305–313 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Freeman, D. et al. Efficacy of cognitive behavioural therapy for sleep improvement in patients with persistent delusions and hallucinations (BEST): a prospective, assessor-blind, randomised controlled pilot trial. s. Lancet Psychiatry 2, 975–983 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Foster, C., Startup, H., Potts, L. & Freeman, D. A randomised controlled trial of a worry intervention for individuals with persistent persecutory delusions. J. Behav. Ther. Exp. Psychiatry 41, 45–51 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  11. NICE. Psychosis and Schizophrenia in Adults: Treatment and Management [CG 178] (National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, 2019).

  12. Myin-Germeys, I. & van Os, J. Stress-reactivity in psychosis: evidence for an affective pathway to psychosis. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 27, 409–424 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Garety, P., Kuipers, E., Fowler, D., Freeman, D. & Bebbington, P. A cognitive model of the positive symptoms of psychosis. Psychol. Med 31, 189–195 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Freeman, D. & Garety, P. Advances in understanding and treating persecutory delusions: a review. Soc. Psychiatry Psychiatr. Epidemiol. 49, 1179–1189 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Freeman, D. Suspicious minds: the psychology of persecutory delusions. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 27, 425–457 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Waller, H. et al. Thinking Well: A randomised controlled feasibility study of a new CBT therapy targeting reasoning biases in people with distressing persecutory delusional beliefs. J. Behav. Ther. Exp. Psychiatry 48, 82–89 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Garety, P. et al. Effects of SlowMo, a blended digital therapy targeting reasoning on paranoia among people with psychosis. JAMA Psychiatry 78, 714–725 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Moritz, S. & Woodward, T. S. Metacognitive training in schizophrenia: from basic research to knowledge translation and intervention. Curr. Opin. Psychiatry 20, 619–625 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Penney, D. et al. Effectiveness, Durability, and Moderators of Metacognitive Training for Psychosis (MCT): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. JAMA Psychiatry 79, 417–429 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Moritz, S., Berna, F., Jaeger, S., Westermann, S. & Nagel, M. The customer is always right? Subjective target symptoms and treatment preferences in patients with psychosis. Eur. Arch. Psychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 267, 335–339 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Freeman, D., Taylor, K. M., Molodynski, A. & Waite, F. Treatable clinical intervention targets for patients with schizophrenia. Schizophr. Res. 211, 44–50 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Garety, P. & Freeman, D. The past and future of delusion research: from the inexplicable to the treatable. Br. J. Psychiatry 203, 327–333 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Nowak, U. et al. Are paranoid ideation and hallucination spectrum experiences differently associated with affect dynamics? A continuous-time modeling approach. Emotion 23, 1294–1305 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Nittel, C. et al. Emotional instability and expressive suppression are related to paranoia in daily life: an experience sampling study in healthy individuals. J. Exp. Psychopathol. https://doi.org/10.1177/2043808719868119 (2019).

  25. Ludwig, L., Mehl, S., Krkovic, K. & Lincoln, T. M. Effectiveness of emotion regulation in daily life in patients with psychosis and non-clinical controls - an experience sampling study. J. Abnorm. Psychol. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000505 (2020).

  26. Lüdtke, T., Kriston, L., Schröder, J., Lincoln, T. M. & Moritz, S. Negative affect and a fluctuating jumping to conclusions bias predict subsequent paranoia in daily life: an online experience sampling study. J. Behav. Ther. Exp. Psychiatry 56, 106–112 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ludwig, L., Mehl, S., Schlier, B., Krkovic, K. & Lincoln, T. M. Awareness and rumination moderate the affective pathway to paranoia in daily life. Schizophr. Res. 216, 161–167 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Krkovic, K., Clamor, A., Schlier, B. & LIncoln, T. M. Emotions and persecutory ideation in daily life: on the trail of the “chicken and egg“ problem. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 192, 215–223 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Schlier, B., Krkovic, K., Clamor, A. & Lincoln, T. M. Autonomic arousal during psychosis spectrum experiences: results from a high resolution ambulatory assessment study over the course of symptom on- and offset. Schizophr. Res. 212, 163–170 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ludwig, L., Werner, D. & Lincoln, T. M. The relevance of cognitive emotion regulation to psychotic symptoms - a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin. Psychol. Rev. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2019.101746 (2019).

  31. Bahlinger, K., Lincoln, T. M. & Clamor, A. Are acute increases and variability in emotion regulation strategies related to negative affect and paranoid thoughts in daily life?. Cogn. Ther. Res. 46, 62–72 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Reeve, S., Sheaves, B. & Freeman, D. The role of sleep dysfunction in the occurrence of delusions and hallucinations: a systematic review. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 42, 96–115 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Hennig, T. & Lincoln, T. M. Sleeping paranoia away? An Actigraphy and Experience Sampling Study with adolescents. Child Psychiatry Hum. Dev. 49, 63–72 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Rehman, A., Gumley, A. & Biello, S. Sleep quality and paranoia: The role of alexithymia, negative emotions and perceptual anomalies. Psychiatry Res. 259, 216–222 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Kammerer, M., Mehl, S., Ludwig, L. & Lincoln, T. M. Sleep and circadian misalignment predict paranoid symptom severity in psychotic patients: a combined actigraphy and experience sampling study. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 130, 78–88 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Gross, J. J. Handbook of Emotion Regulation (Guilford Press, 2007).

  37. Thewissen, V. et al. Emotions, self-esteem, and paranoid episodes: an experience sampling study. Br. J. Clin. Psychol. 50, 178–195 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Thewissen, V., Bentall, R. P., Lecomte, T., van Os, J. & Myin-Germeys, I. Fluctuations in self-esteem and paranoia in the context of daily life. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 117, 143–153 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Kesting, M. L., Bredenpohl, M., Klenke, J., Westermann, S. & Lincoln, T. M. The impact of social stress on self-esteem and paranoid ideation. J. Behav. Ther. Exp. Psychiatry 44, 122–128 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Jaya, E. S., Ascone, L. & Lincoln, T. M. A longitudinal mediation analysis of the effect of negative-self schemas on positive symptoms via negative affect. Psychol. Med. 28, 1–11 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Daemen, M. & van Amelsvoort, T. Group Investigators, Reininghaus U. Self-esteem and psychosis in daily life: an experience sampling study. J. Psychopathol. Clin. Sci. 131, 182–197 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Kesting, M. L. & Lincoln, T. M. The relevance of self-esteem and self-schemas to persecutory delusions: a systematic review. Compr. Psychiatry 54, 766–789 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Murphy, P., Bentall, R., Freeman, D., O’Rourke, S. & Hutton, P. The paranoia as defence model of persecutory delusions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Psychiatry 5, 913–929 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Barrowclough, C. et al. Self-Esteem in Schizophrenia: relationships Between Self-Evaluation, Family Attitudes, and Symptomatology. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 112, 92–99 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Lincoln, T. M., Mehl, S., Exner, C. & Rief, W. Attributional style and persecutory delusions. Evidence for an event independent and state specific external-personal attribution bias for social situations. Cogn. Ther. Res. 41, 187–197 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Moritz, S. et al. Course and determinants of self-esteem in people diagnosed with schizophrenia during psychiatric treatment. Psychosis 2, 144–153 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Mehl, S. et al. Feasibility and efficacy estimate of an emotion-focused version of cognitive behavior therapy for patients with delusions (CBT-E) in comparison to wait list in a single-blinded randomized-controlled pilot trial. Schizophr. Bull. Open www.kbv.de/media/sp/PraxisWissen_Soziotherapie.pdf (2021).

  48. König, D. Die Regulation von negativen und positiven Emotionen. Entwicklung des Emotionsregulations-Inventars und Vergleich von Migränikerinnen mit Kontrollpersonen (University of Vienna, 2011).

  49. Fowler, D. et al. The Brief Core Schema Scales (BCSS): psychometric properties and associations with paranoia and grandiosity in non-clinical and psychosis samples. Psychol. Med. 36, 749–759 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Freeman, D. et al. Comparison of a theoretically driven cognitive therapy (the Feeling Safe Programme) with befriending for the treatment of persisting persecutory delusions: a parallel single-blind randomised controlled trial. Lancet Psychiatry 8, 696–707 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Jones, C., Hacker, D., Cormac, I., Meaden, A. & Irving, C. B. Cognitive behavioural therapy versus other psychosocial treatments for schizophrenia. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008712.pub2 (2014).

  52. Hall, P. L. & Tarrier, N. The cognitive-behavioural treatment of low self-esteem in psychotic patients: a pilot study. Behav. Res. Ther. 41, 317–332 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Lecomte, T. et al. Efficacy of a self-esteem module in the empowerment of individuals with chronic schizophrenia. J. Nerv. Ment. Dis. 187, 406–413 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Leendertse, J. C. P. et al. Personal recovery in people with a psychotic disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis of associated factors. Front. Psychiatry 12, 2021 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Phalen, P., Kimhy, D., Jobes, D. & Bennett, M. Emotional distress and dysregulation as treatment targets to reduce suicide in psychosis: a scoping review. Eur. Arch. Psychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 274, 955–961 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Enders, C. K. in Handbook of Structural Equation Modeling (ed. Hoyle, H. R.) 223–248 (Guilford Press, 2023).

  57. Enders, C. K. Missing data: an update on the state of the art. Psychol. Methods https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000563 (2023).

  58. Jolley, S. et al. A pilot evaluation of therapist training in cognitive therapy for psychosis: therapy quality and clinical outcomes. Behav. Cogn. Psychother. 43, 478–489 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Opoka, S. M., Ludwig, L., Mehl, S. & Lincoln, T. M. An Experimental study on the effectiveness of emotion regulation in patients with acute delusions. Schizophr. Res. 228, 206–217 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Haddock, G., McCarron, J., Tarrier, N. & Faragher, E. B. Scales to measure dimensions of hallucinations and delusions: the psychotic symptom rating scales (PSYRATS). Psychol. Med 29, 879–889 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  61. First, M. B., Williams, J. B. W., Karg, R. S. & Spitzer, R. L. Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 Disorders - Clinician Version (American Psychiatric Association, 2016).

  62. Kay, S. R., Fiszbein, A. & Opler, L. A. The positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS) for schizophrenia. Schizophr. Bull. 13, 261–276 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Kay, S. R., Opler, L. A. & Fiszbein, A. Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) (Multi Health Systems Inc., 1992).

  64. Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K. D. & Wilson, K. G. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy: An Experiential Approach to Behavior Change 1st edn (Guilford Press, 1999).

  65. Greenberg, L. S. & Klosterziel, R. Emotionsfokussierte Therapie 1st edn (Reinhard Verlag, 2016).

  66. Hautzinger, M. Kognitive Verhaltenstherapie bei Depression (Beltz, 2021).

  67. Spiegelhalder, K., Backhaus, J. & Riemann, D. Schlafstörungen (Fortschritte der Psychotherapie) (Hogrefe, 2011).

  68. Schweiger, U., Wells, A., Schweiger, J. & Korn, O. Metakognitive Therapie bei Angst und Depression 1st edn (Beltz 2011).

  69. Gilbert, P. Compassion-Focused Therapy: Distinctive Features (Routledge Chapman & Hall, 2010).

  70. Chadwick, P. Person-Based Cognitive Therapy for Distressing Psychosis (Wiley, 2006).

  71. Peters, E. R., Joseph, S., Day, S. & Garety, P. Measuring delusional ideation: the 21-item Peters et al. delusions inventory (PDI). Schizophr. Bull. 30, 1005–1022 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  72. Geck, S. et al. COSMIN systematic review and meta-analysis of the measurement properties of the positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS). EClinicalMedicine 82, 103155 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  73. Mueller, M. J. et al. The Calgary depression rating scale for schizophrenia: development and interrater reliability of a German version (CDSS-G). J. Psychiatr. Res. 10, 799–812 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  74. Goodman, S. H., Sewell, D. R., Cooley, E. L. & Leavitt, N. Assessing levels of adaptive functioning: the role functioning scale. Community Ment. Health J 29, 119–131 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  75. Benkert, O. & Hippius, H. Kompendium der Psychiatrischen Pharmakotherapie 14th edn (Springer Verlag, 2023).

  76. Abler, B. & Kessler, H. Emotion regulation questionnaire - Eine deutschsprachige Fassung des ERQ von Gross und John. Diagnostica 55, 144–152 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  77. Berking, M. & Znoj, H. Development and validation of a questionnaire for standardised self-evaluation of emotion regulation skills (ERSQ). Z. Psychiatr. Psychol. Psychother. 56, 141–153 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  78. Glöckner-Rist, A. & Rist, F. in Das Wissen um die Messung: Zusammenstellung sozialwissenschaftlicher Items und Skalen (eds Danner, D. & Glöckner-Rist, A) (GESIS, 2014).

  79. Bastien, C. H., Vallières, A. & Morin, C. M. Validation of the Insomnia Severity Index as an outcome measure for insomnia research. Sleep. Med. 2, 297–307 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  80. Gerber, M. et al. Validation of the German version of the insomnia severity index in adolescents, young adults and adult workers: results from three cross-sectional studies. BMC Psychiatry https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-016-0876-8 (2016).

  81. von Collani, G. & Herzberg, P. Eine revidierte Fassung der deutschsprachigen Skala um Selbstwertgefuehl von Rosenberg. Z. fuer Diffentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie 24, 3–7 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  82. Hupfeld, J. & Ruffieux, N. Validierung einer deutschen Version der Self-Compassion Scale (SDS-D). Z. Klin. Psychol Psychother 40, 115–123 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  83. Haddock, G. et al. An inverstigation into the psychometric properties of the cognitive therapy scale for psychosis (CTS-PSY). Behav. Cogn. Psychother. 29, 221–233 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  84. Borm, G. F., Fransen, J. & Lemmens, W. A. J. G. A simple sample size formula for analysis of covariance in randomized clinical trials. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 60, 1234–1238 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  85. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A. & Lang, A. G. Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav. Res. Methods 41, 1149–1160 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  86. Rosseel, Y. lavaan: an R package for structural equation modeling. J. Stat. Softw. 48, 1–36 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  87. Twisk, J. et al. Different ways to estimate treatment effects in randomised controlled trials. Contemp. Clin. Trials Commun. 10, 80–85 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  88. Feingold, A. Effect sizes for growth-modeling analysis for controlled clinical trials in the same metric as for classical analysis. Psychol. Methods 14, 43–53 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  89. Feingold, A. Confidence interval estimation for standardized effect sizes in multilevel and latent growth modeling. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 83, 157–168 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  90. Stekhoven, D. J. & Buehlmann, P. MissForest—non-parametric missing value imputation for mixed-type data. Bioinformatics 28, 112–118 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank all participants and the outpatient and inpatient clinic staff who helped support our study: especially we thank Julian Bartke, Sarah Böwer, Nora Deventer, Lisa Dietrich, Meike Engel, Inga Frantz, Nathalie Fritsch, Judith Gonschor, Philipp Herzog, Alexandra Hinkel, Valeska Hug, Franziska Jeromin, Stefanie Krey, Philipp Krug, Nico Leppin, Sandra Lorek, Anne Maenz, Amelie Mattern, Anja Müller, Sandra Päpper, Lea Rebstock, Judith Reichhardt, Paula Siegmann, Hannah Schmucker, Julia Schulz, Julia Sölch, Nele Struck, Asieh Tamari, Janina Thür, Karén Wilhelm, Julia Wittkowski and Yin Zhou. We thank the scientific assistants and blinded raters Nina Bauer, Sophia Belz, Björn Buedenbender, Thilo Friehs, Jasmin Kiener, Johanna Nüsken, Hedda Matzerath, Joachim Rduch, Simon Samstag, Sandra Opoka, and Daniela Zanfino. Finally, we thank Alexandra Kleiman for randomizing the patients. This work was supported by an award from the German Research Foundation (DFG: ME 4490/1-1/ LI 1298-8-1). The funder had no role in the study design, conduct, data collection and analysis, manuscript preparation, and reporting.

Funding

Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Marburg University, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Marburg, Germany

    Stephanie Mehl

  2. Department of Health and Social Work, Frankfurt University of Applied Sciences, Frankfurt am Main, Germany

    Stephanie Mehl

  3. Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Köln, Germany

    Christopher Hautmann

  4. Department of Psychology, University of Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany

    Björn Schlier

  5. Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany

    Björn Schlier, Lea Ludwig & Tania Marie Lincoln

  6. Marburg University, Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Marburg, Germany

    Laura Marie-Louise Dorn & Winfried Rief

  7. Mental Health Research and Treatment Center, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany

    Tobias Teismann

  8. Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Justus-Liebig University of Gießen, Gießen, Germany

    Michael Franz

  9. Vitos Clinic for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Gießen & Marburg, Marburg, Germany

    Michael Franz

  10. Department of Psychotherapy and System Neuroscience, Justus-Liebig University of Gießen, Gießen, Germany

    Rudolf Stark

Authors
  1. Stephanie Mehl
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Christopher Hautmann
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Björn Schlier
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Laura Marie-Louise Dorn
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Lea Ludwig
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Tobias Teismann
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Michael Franz
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Winfried Rief
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Rudolf Stark
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Tania Marie Lincoln
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

S.M. and T.M.L. conceived the study, planned the trial’s design, interpreted the data, wrote the manuscript, and are the chief investigators; C.H. performed statistical analyses and data interpretation and contributed to writing and revising the manuscript; B. S. contributed to writing, data interpretation, and revising the manuscript; L.D., L.L., and T.T. organized the trial and contributed to writing, data interpretation, and revising the manuscript; W.R., M.F., and R.S. contributed to data interpretation, writing, and revising the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephanie Mehl.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare they have competing interests; S.M., T.L., L.D., L.L., and T.T. provide training and/or supervision in CBTp/CBTd-E. All other authors have no competing interests to report.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

41537_2026_737_MOESM1_ESM.pdf

Supplement Efficacy of an emotion-oriented Cognitive Behavior Therapy for delusions (CBTd-E) compared to waitlist in a single-blinded randomized controlled trial

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mehl, S., Hautmann, C., Schlier, B. et al. Efficacy of an emotion-oriented cognitive behavior therapy for delusions (CBTd-E) compared to waitlist in a single-blinded randomized-controlled trial. Schizophr (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41537-026-00737-y

Download citation

  • Received: 11 October 2025

  • Accepted: 30 January 2026

  • Published: 17 February 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41537-026-00737-y

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Journal Information
  • Content types
  • Contact
  • About the Editors
  • Open Access
  • Meeting Abstracts & Reports
  • Editorial policies
  • About the Partner
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For Authors & Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Schizophrenia (Schizophr)

ISSN 2754-6993 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing