Fig. 5: Random forest analysis between ABTGC and MUC5B shows the networks differ most in terms of propionate and fumarate metabolism utilization. | npj Systems Biology and Applications

Fig. 5: Random forest analysis between ABTGC and MUC5B shows the networks differ most in terms of propionate and fumarate metabolism utilization.

From: An updated genome-scale metabolic network reconstruction of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA14 to characterize mucin-driven shifts in bacterial metabolism

Fig. 5

The top seven most discriminating reactions between the two models belong to propionate and fumarate metabolism. MUC5B utilizes these two types of metabolism more highly than the ABTGC model.

Back to article page