Fig. 3: Antigenic relationships revealed by Mab typing.
From: An antigen panel to assess the regional relevance of foot and mouth disease vaccines
The order of both row and column items is defined by modular leaf ordering methods and based on the smallest average distance of the estimated subtrees. The percentage of reactivity is normalised and expressed on a scale from 0 to 100. The panel viruses are highlighted with delineated reactivity pattern borders. For each serotype the four highlighted viruses are those selected for the final panel. A Results for serotype O viruses, typed with Mabs raised against different O strains (7E1 and 4B7 were raised against O/Italy/93, whilst the others were raised against O/Switzerland/1965, O/UKG/2001 or O Manisa as indicated in the Mab name). B Results for serotype A viruses, typed with Mabs raised against different A strains (as indicated in the Mab name). C Results for serotype SAT 1 viruses, typed with Mabs raised against SAT 1/BOT 1/68. D Results for serotype SAT 2 viruses, typed with Mabs raised against SAT 2/ZIM/5/81.
