Table 2 Applications of nanoparticles membrane bioreactor (NPs-MBR) system.
From: A critical review on nanomaterials membrane bioreactor (NMs-MBR) for wastewater treatment
Membrane materials | Membrane characteristics | Wastewater type/characteristics | Configuration | Operational conditions | Performance | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polyethersulfone (PES)/TiO2 NPs | Membrane pore size = 0.2 µm | Synthetic wastewater | Submerged MBR | SRT = 50 d, MLSS = 6900 mg L−1, MLVSS = 4400 mg L−1, SCOD = 52 mg L−1, T = 24 ± 2 °C | Lower rate of membrane fouling | |
Polysulfone (PSf)/Fe3O4 NPs | Membrane surface area = 23.75 cm2 | Industrial wastewater | MBR | V = 7.5 L, pH = 8 ± 1, T = 25–27 °C, SRT = infinite days | COD (98%), 30% higher flux, 27% lower filtration resistance | |
Polyvinyl chloride (PVC)/ zinc oxide NPs | Mean pore size = 504.35 nm, Mean roughness = 13.6 nm | Hospital wastewater COD = 950 mg L−1, NH3 = 165 mg L−1, NO3 = 45 mg L−1, P = 17.23 mg L−1, TSS = 636 mg L−1 | UCT-MBR | V = 8.0 L, HRT = 2 h, SRT = 25 d, T = 25 ± 2 °C | COD (73.5 %), FRE (87 %) | |
High-density polyethylene (HDPE)/SiO2 NPs | Membrane surface area = 14 × 10−4 m2 | Industrial wastewater COD = 3000 mg L−1, BOD = 1250 mg L−1 | MBR | V = 12 L, HRT = 24 h, SRT = 20 d, aeration rate 0.5 L min−1, MLSS = 8000 mg L−1 | COD (96.7%), FR (89.95%) | |
Cellulose acetate (CA)/cellulose ester/TiO2 NPs | Membrane surface area = 26.42 cm2 | Municipal wastewater | Submerged MBR | V = 0.2 L, Pressure = 0.3-bar | Higher filtration resistance | |
PSf/alumina NPs | Membrane surface area = 23.75 cm2 | Industrial wastewater | Submerged MBR | V = 8 L, pH =8.3, SRT = infinite, MLSS = 12 ± 0.5 kg L−1 | COD (90.28%), DR (91.18%), Rf (m−1) × 1011 = 1.61 | |
CA/nanodiamond (ND) | Membrane surface area = 14.7 cm2 | Pharmaceutical wastewater COD = 2800 mg L−1 | MBR | V = 12 L, HRT = 24 h, SRT = 25 d, Aeration = 2.5–3 m3  m−2 h−1, MLSS = 6500–7000 mg L−1, T = 25 °C | COD (91%), FRR (95.2%), PWF = 350 L m2 h−1 | |
PES/polycitrate- alumoxane NPs | Membrane surface area = 12.56 cm2 | Milk processing wastewater COD = 2131 mg L−1, BOD = 1535.7 mg L−1, TN = 273.1 mg L−1, TP = 60.2 mg L−1, pH=5.5 | MBR | V = 4.4 L, HRT = 8 h, SRT = 60 d,flow rate = 0.80 L h−1, permeate flux = 18.2 L m2 h−1 | COD (94.2%), TN (38%), TP (34.2%), Turbidity (~100%) FRR (95.2%) | |
Polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF)/ silica NPs |  | Municipal wastewater | Pilot-scale MBR | Water flux = 100 L m−2 h−1 | Water flux recovery (60%) | |
Graphene/polyaniline/phytic acid | Membrane surface area = 40 cm2 | Yeast suspension solution Zetapotential = − 12.9 mV, Size = 7 μm | Electric field MBR | V = 2.7 L, aeration rate = 0.2 m3 h−1, MLSS = 2000 mg L−1 | ~11% higher filtration efficiency | |
Graphene (Gr)/polypyrrole (PPy) | Membrane surface area = 80 cm2 | Yeast suspension solution Zetapotential = − 12.9 mV, Size = 7 μm | Electric field MBR | V = 4 L, aeration rate = 0.2 m3 h−1, MLSS = 5000 mg L−1 | Better antifouling performance | |
Polyvinyl alcohol (PVA)/TiO2 NPs | Membrane surface area = 500 cm2 | Synthetic wastewater COD = 200–250 mg L−1, (COD/TN) ratio = 5–6, pH = 7–8 | Submerged anoxic/oxic MBR (A/O-MBR) | V = 8 L, HRT = 6 h, SRT = 24 d, aeration = 2–3 m3 m-2  h−1, MLSS = 6000–7000 mg L−1, T = 15–20 °C | Less fouling (87%), NH4-N (97%), TN (80%) | |
PVDF/TiO2NPs | Membrane surface area = 50 cm2 | Synthetic wastewater | Algal membrane bioreactor (A-MBR) | V = 4 L, HRT = 0.5 d, SRT = 25 d, T = 23 ± 2 °C | Better antifouling property P (78%), N (34%) | |
PVDF/TiO2NPs | Membrane surface area = 15.89 cm2 | Oil wastewater COD = 2300–2500 mg L−1 | Submerged MBR | V = 10 L, HRT = 25–28 h, SRT = 70–100 d, MLSS = 6000–7000 mg L−1 | Higher pure water flux Lower fouling resistance | |
PES/Ag-GO | Membrane surface area = 38 cm2 | synthetic wastewater and sludge COD = 599 ± 20 mg L−1 | MBR | V = 50 L, pressure= 0.6 bar, aeration = 8 L min−1, MLSS = 8500 ± 756 mg L−1, pH = 7 ± 0.5 | COD ( > 95%) | |
Polypropylene (PP)/TiO2 NPs | Membrane surface area = 14.7 cm2 | Real wastewater COD = 178 mg L−1 | Submerged MBR | V = 12 L, HRT = 24 h, SRT = 20 d, pressure = 0.1 bar, aeration = 0.5–1.5 m3 m−2 h−1, MLSS = 7000 mg L−1 | COD (70%) | |
PP/TiO2 NPs | Membrane surface area = 14 cm2 | Real wastewater COD = 178 mg L−1 | Aerobic MBR | V = 20 L, HRT = 24 h, SRT = 20 d, pressure = 0.1 bar, aeration = 0.5 L min−1, MLSS = 7000 mg L−1, T = room temp, pH = 6.8–7.6 | COD (65.16%) | |
PVDF/Ag-SiO2 NPs | Membrane surface area = 56.52 cm2 | Pharmaceutical wastewater COD = 1500 mg L−1 | Submerged MBR | V = 20 L, HRT = 12 h, SRT = 20 d, pressure = 0.2 bar, MLSS = 7000–8000 mg L−1 | COD ( > 90 %), NH4+-N( > 95 %), | |
PSf/ND | Membrane surface area = 14.7 cm2 | Pharmaceutical wastewater | Submerged MBR | V = 50 mL, HRT = 24 h, SRT = 25 d, pressure = 0.1 bar, aeration = 2.5–3 m3 m−2 h−1, MLSS = 7500–8000 mg L−1, T = 25 °C | FRR (58.93 %) | |
HDPE/ND-PEG | Membrane surface area = 14.7 cm2 | Pharmaceutical wastewater COD = 3300 mg L−1 | Submerged MBR | V = 25 mL, HRT = 37 h, SRT = 30 d, pressure = 0.1 bar, aeration = 1 Lmin−1 MLSS = 7500 mg L−1 | FRR (77.9%) | |
PVC/polycarbonate(PC)/ Ag NPs | Membrane surface area = 14.7 cm2 | Pharmaceutical wastewater COD = 1200 mg L−1 | Submerged MBR | V = 25 mL, HRT = 4 h, SRT = 25 d, pressure = 0.1 bar, aeration = 2.5 m3 m−2  h−1, MLSS = 7500–8000 mg L−1, T = 25 °C | FRR (97.02%), COD (98.1%) | |
PVC/Ag NPs | Membrane surface area = 14.7 cm2 | Pharmaceutical wastewater COD = 1200 mg L−1 | Submerged MBR | V = 25 mL, HRT = 24 h, SRT = 25 d, pressure = 0.1 bar, aeration = 2.5 m3 m−2 h−1, MLSS = 7500–8000 mg L−1, T = 25 °C | FR (99.8%), COD (94 %) |