Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

A prevalent neglect of environmental control in mammalian cell culture calls for best practices

In biomedical studies, the environmental conditions used in mammalian cell culture are often underreported, and are seldom monitored or controlled. Best-practice standards are urgently needed.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Prevalence of reporting of the environmental conditions of mammalian cell culture in 810 randomly selected biomedical studies published in 2014–2019.

References

  1. Scherer, W. F., Syverton, J. T. & Gey, G. O. J. Exp. Med. 97, 695–710 (1953).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Regev, A. et al. Elife 6, e27041 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Cohen, E. P. & Eagle, H. J. Exp. Med. 113, 467–474 (1961).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Prokop, A. & Rosenberg, M. Z. in Vertebrate Cell Culture II and Enzyme Technology (ed Fiechter, A.) 29–71 (Springer, 1989).

  5. Hu, W.-S. & Aunins, J. G. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 8, 148–153 (1997).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Merten, O.-W. Cytotechnology 50, 1–7 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Petricciani, J. C. Cytotechnology 18, 9–13 (1995).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Place, T. L., Domann, F. E. & Case, A. J. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 113, 311–322 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Naciri, M., Kuystermans, D. & Al-Rubeai, M. Cytotechnology 57, 245–250 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Michl, J., Park, K. C. & Swietach, P. Commun. Biol. 2, 144 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Anderson, L. & Henrich, W. South. Med. J. 80, 729–733 (1987).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gunnerson, K. J., Saul, M., He, S. & Kellum, J. A. Crit. Care 10, R22 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Jung, B. et al. Crit. Care 15, R238 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Baker, L. E. J. Exp. Med. 58, 575–583 (1933).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Ceccarini, C. & Eagle, H. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 68, 229–233 (1971).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Eagle, H. J. Cell. Physiol. 82, 1–8 (1973).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Mackenzie, C. G., Mackenzie, J. B. & Beck, P. J. Cell Biol. 9, 141–156 (1961).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Taylor, A. C. J. Cell Biol. 15, 201–209 (1962).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Horne, W. C., Norman, N. E., Schwartz, D. B. & Simons, E. R. Eur. J. Biochem. 120, 295–302 (1981).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Johnson, J. D., Epel, D. & Paul, M. Nature 262, 661–664 (1976).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. L’Allemain, G., Paris, S. & Pouysségur, J. J. Biol. Chem. 259, 5809–5815 (1984).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lindström, P. & Sehlin, J. Biochem. J. 218, 887–892 (1984).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. McBrian, M. A. et al. Mol. Cell 49, 310–321 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Moolenaar, W., Tsien, R., van der Saag, P. & de Laat, S. Nature 304, 645–648 (1983).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Pouyssegur, J., Franchi, A., L’Allemain, G. & Paris, S. FEBS Lett. 190, 115–119 (1985).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Boron, W. & Russell, J. J. Gen. Physiol. 81, 373–399 (1983).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Bowen, J. W. & Levinson, C. J. Membr. Biol. 79, 7–18 (1984).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine 2019 https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/medicine/2019/summary (2021).

  29. Ando, T., Mikawa, K., Nishina, K., Misumi, T. & Obara, H. J. Int. Med. Res. 35, 118–126 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Jyoti, S. & Tandon, S. Exp. Cell Res. 322, 389–401 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Xie, Z. et al. Neurodegener. Dis. 1, 29–37 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Kikuchi, R. et al. Free Rad. Biol. Med. 134, 200–214 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Kikuchi, R. et al. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 57, 570–580 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Vohwinkel, C. U. et al. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 37067–37076 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Chen, Q., Fischer, A., Reagan, J. D., Yan, L.-J. & Ames, B. N. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 92, 4337–4341 (1995).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Jeong, C.-H. et al. J. Biol. Chem. 282, 13672–13679 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Knighton, D. R. et al. Science 221, 1283–1285 (1983).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Packer, L. & Fuehr, K. Nature 267, 423–425 (1977).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Pham, I. et al. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol. 283, L1133–L1142 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Rueckert, R. R. & Mueller, G. C. Cancer Res. 20, 944–949 (1960).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. von Zglinicki, T., Saretzki, G., Döcke, W. & Lotze, C. Exp. Cell Res. 220, 186–193 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Duarte, C. M., Jaremko, Ł. & Jaremko, M. Front. Public Health 8, 543322 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Freedman, L. P. et al. Nat. Methods 12, 493–497 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Errington, T. M. et al. Elife 3, e04333 (2014).

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Kaiser, J. Science https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aau9619 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Al-Ani, A. et al. PLoS ONE 13, e0204269 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Ben-David, U. et al. Nature 560, 325–330 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Muelas, M. W., Ortega, F., Breitling, R., Bendtsen, C. & Westerhoff, H. V. Sci. Rep. 8, 116 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Kaelin, W. G. Jr & Ratcliffe, P. J. Mol. Cell 30, 393–402 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Maxwell, P., Pugh, C. & Ratcliffe, P. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 90, 2423–2427 (1993).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Wang, G. L., Jiang, B.-H., Rue, E. A. & Semenza, G. L. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 92, 5510–5514 (1995).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Eagle, H. Science 174, 500–503 (1971).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Hanrahan, J. & Tabcharani, J. J. Membr. Biol. 116, 65–77 (1990).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Stea, A. & Nurse, C. A. Neurosci. Lett. 132, 239–242 (1991).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Bing, O. H., Brooks, W. W. & Messer, J. V. Science 180, 1297–1298 (1973).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Gilbert, H. T., Hodson, N., Baird, P., Richardson, S. M. & Hoyland, J. A. Sci. Rep. 6, 37360 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Tomura, H. et al. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 34458–34464 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Khacho, M. et al. Nat. Commun. 5, 3550 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Youle, R. J. & van der Bliek, A. M. Science 337, 1062–1065 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Bumke, M. A., Neri, D. & Elia, G. Proteomics 3, 675–688 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Li, M. & Izpisua Belmonte, J. C. N. Engl. J. Med. 380, 569–579 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Ryall, J. G., Cliff, T., Dalton, S. & Sartorelli, V. Cell Stem Cell 17, 651–662 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Shyh-Chang, N. & Ng, H.-H. Genes Dev. 31, 336–346 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. DiStefano, T. et al. Stem Cell Rep. 10, 300–313 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Kim, N., Minami, N., Yamada, M. & Imai, H. Reprod. Med. Biol. 16, 58–66 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Ast, T. & Mootha, V. K. Nat. Metab. 1, 858–860 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Phelan, D. E., Mota, C., Lai, C., Kierans, S. J. & Cummins, E. P. Interface Focus 11, 20200033 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Wittmann, C., Kim, H. M., John, G. & Heinzle, E. Biotechnol. Lett. 25, 377–380 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Kieninger, J. et al. Biosens. (Basel) 8, 44 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Young, E. W. & Beebe, D. J. Chem. Soc. Rev. 39, 1036–1048 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Shi, J. et al. Trends Anal. Chem. 117, 263–279 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Ellert, A. & Grebe, A. Nat. Methods. 8, i–ii (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Kumar, G. S., Kumar, B. K. & Mishra, M. K. In IET Conference on Renewable Power Generation https://doi.org/10.1049/cp.2011.0176 (IET, 2011).

  74. Koenig, L. et al. Eppendorf Application Note No. 364 (Eppendorf, 2018).

  75. Snyder, M. P. et al. Nature 583, 693–698 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. Feingold, E. A. et al. Science 306, 636–640 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank members of the Li laboratory for helpful discussions, and J. Xu and M. K. Y. Sicat for administrative support. We also thank members of the Izpisua Belmonte laboratory for their critical feedback on early versions of the manuscript. This work was supported by the King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST) Office of Sponsored Research (OSR) under award number OSR-2017-CRG-3412. Work in the Izpisua Belmonte laboratory was supported by The Moxie Foundation. The King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST) Office of Sponsored Research (OSR) supported the research of the Li laboratory, under award numbers BAS/1/1080-01 and URF/1/3412-01-01. KAUST supported the contribution of the Duarte laboratory through baseline funding to C.M.D.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

S.G.K., S.M.A., A.S., S.A., A.J.P., K.A. and M.L. extracted metadata. S.G.K. and S.M.A. performed data analyses. S.G.K., S.M.A., M.L. and C.M.D. interpreted the results. M.L. and C.M.D. wrote the initial draft, with major contributions from S.G.K. and S.M.A. S.G.K. and S.M.A. revised the text during the review process and consolidated edits from all authors. C.M.D., J.C.I.B. and M.L. conceived and supervised the study. All authors approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Juan Carlos Izpisua Belmonte, Mo Li or Carlos M. Duarte.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Biomedical Engineering thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figs. 1 and 2, Methods, References and Table captions.

Supplementary Tables

Supplementary Tables 1–5.

Data and code

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Klein, S.G., Alsolami, S.M., Steckbauer, A. et al. A prevalent neglect of environmental control in mammalian cell culture calls for best practices. Nat Biomed Eng 5, 787–792 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41551-021-00775-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41551-021-00775-0

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing