Extended Data Fig. 6: Results of sensitivity analysis when tree cover loss in the GHG flux model is attributed to commodity-driven deforestation in the alternative model vs. shifting agriculture in the standard model.
From: Global maps of twenty-first century forest carbon fluxes
Top panel: Percent change in net GHG flux between standard model and sensitivity analysis model; Bottom panel: Delineation of areas that remain a net GHG source or sink in the sensitivity analysis model vs. those that switch from being a net source or sink to a net sink or source as a result of the changes applied. For display purposes, maps have been resampled from the 30-m observation scale to a 0.04-degree geographic grid.
