Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

Research codes and contracts do not guarantee equitable research with Indigenous communities

Research codes and contracts have been developed to protect Indigenous and marginalized peoples from exploitation and to promote inclusion, so that research will become more beneficial to them. We highlight three important but often overlooked challenges for such instruments, drawing on examples from the San of southern Africa.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: San distribution in southern Africa.

References

  1. Schroeder, D., Chatfield, K., Singh, M., Chennells, R. & Herissone-Kelly, P. in Equitable Research Partnerships: A Global Code of Conduct to Counter Ethics Dumping (eds D. Schroeder et al.), 73–87 (Springer International, 2019).

  2. Nature 606, 7 (2022).

  3. Koot, S. et al. Hunt. Gather. Res. 6, https://doi.org/10.3828/hgr.2023.4 (in the press).

  4. Grant, J. Crit. Arts 34, 103–104 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Agrawal, A. & Gibson, C. World Dev. 27, 629–649 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Francis, M. & Francis, S. Crit. Arts 24, 210–227 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ramutsindela, M. Parks and People in Postcolonial Societies: Experiences in Southern Africa (Kluwer Academic, 2004).

  8. Grant, J. Rural Development in Practice? The Experience of the ≠Khomani Bushmen in the Northern Cape, South Africa. PhD thesis, Univ. Edinburgh (2011).

  9. Koot, S. & Büscher, B. J. South. Afr. Stud. 45, 357–374 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sylvain, R. Am. Anthropol. 104, 1074–1085 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Vermeylen, S. Local Environ. 12, 423–436 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Koot, S. & Van Beek, W. Conserv. Soc. 15, 136–146 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Biesele, M. & Hitchcock, R. The Ju/’hoan San of Nyae Nyae and Namibian Independence: Development, Democracy, and Indigenous Voices in Southern Africa (Berghahn Books, 2011).

  14. Puckett, F., Kazunobu, I. & Hitchcock, R. in Research and Activism among the Kalahari San Today: Ideals, Challenges, and Debates (eds F. Puckett & I. Kazunobu) 1–28 (National Museum of Ethnology, 2018).

  15. Hitchcock, R. K. Hum. Nat. 30, 217–241 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Barnard, A. Bushmen: Kalahari Hunter-gatherers and their Descendants (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2019).

  17. Hitchcock, R. & Babchuck, W. in Genocide of Indigenous Peoples (eds S. Totten & R. Hitchcock) 143–172 (Routledge, 2011).

  18. Koot, S., Hitchcock, R. & Gressier, C. J. South. Afr. Stud. 45, 341–355 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Suzman, J. An Assessment of the Status of the San in Namibia (Legal Assistance Centre, 2001).

  20. Puckett, F. SENRI Ethnol. Stud. 99, 283–342 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gordon, R. & Douglas, S. The Bushman Myth: The Making of a Namibian Underclass (Westview, 2000).

  22. Koot, S. SENRI Ethnol. Stud. 99, 231–250 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Haraway, D. Fem. Stud. 14, 575–599 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. WIMSA. WIMSA Media and Research Contract (WIMSA, 2001).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

S.K. and J.G. have led the writing of this Comment, and all other authors have contributed and shared ideas.

Positionality statement. Our group of authors consists of nine ethnographers and nine San, from the Hai//om, ǃXung and Ju/’hoansi in Namibia, the //Gana Khwe in Botswana and the ≠Khomani in South Africa. Most of these ethnographers have done extensive research among and in collaboration with different San groups, some reaching back to the 1970s. The collaborations focus on research (including translation, interpretation and organizational matters), but some also include activism, development or advocacy.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stasja Koot.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Koot, S., Grant, J., //Khumûb, M. et al. Research codes and contracts do not guarantee equitable research with Indigenous communities. Nat Ecol Evol 7, 1543–1546 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-023-02101-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-023-02101-0

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing