Correction to: Nature Energy https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-018-0282-1, published online 19 November 2018.

Owing to a technical error, in the version of this Article originally published some proof corrections were missing.

In Table 3, the first value for consumption feedback read –0.123 and should have read –0.124. The standard error for the second value of flow rate read 0.005 and should have read 0.006. The first value for constant read 0.412 and should have read 0.413. The second and third values for observations read 8,826 and should have read 8,824.

In Table 4, the value for consumption feedback read –0.196 and should have read –0.197. The value for hotel 2 read 0.038 and should have read 0.037. The value for hotel 3 read –0.071 and should have read –0.072. The value and standard error for hotel 1, the constant, read 1.917 (0.046) and should have read 1.918 (0.045). The value for observations read 19,602 and should have read 19,596.

In the Methods section, in the third paragraph of the “Data” subsection, the values 19,602 and 8,826 should have read 19,596 and 8,824, respectively.

These errors have now been corrected.