Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Heat treatment in an oxygen-rich environment to suppress deep-level traps in Cu2ZnSnS4 solar cell with 11.51% certified efficiency

Abstract

Sulfide kesterite Cu2ZnSnS4 (CZTS) is a competitive photovoltaic material, especially for multijunction solar cells. However, the device power conversion efficiency has remained stagnant for years. Deep-level defects, such as sulfur vacancies (VS), cause serious non-radiative recombination of charge carriers. Here we propose a passivation strategy for VS through the heat treatment of the CdS/CZTS heterojunction in an oxygen-rich environment. In this process, VS are occupied by oxygen atoms, suppressing VS defects. In addition, the diffusion of Cd ions to the CZTS absorber layer, and the formation of positive Na–O and Sn–O complexes can passivate related defects. These effects led to a reduced charge recombination and favourable band alignment. We demonstrate a certified efficiency of 11.51% for air-solution-processed CZTS solar cells (bandgap of 1.5 eV) without any extrinsic cation alloying. The study offers insights into defect passivation and performance improvement mechanism of kesterite solar cells.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Solar cell fabrication and photovoltaic performance.
Fig. 2: Characterization of oxygen distribution and element diffusion.
Fig. 3: Characterization of surface electrical properties and interface band alignment.
Fig. 4: Characterization of defect properties and carrier dynamics.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. The data that support the findings of this study are available within the Article and its Supplementary Information. Source data are provided with this paper.

References

  1. Green, M. A. et al. Solar cell efficiency tables (version 49). Prog. Photovoltaics Res. Appl. 25, 3–13 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Pal, K. et al. Current challenges and future prospects for a highly efficient (>20%) kesterite CZTS solar cell: a review. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 196, 138–156 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kirchartz, T. et al. What makes a good solar cell? Adv. Energy Mater. 8, 1703385 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Baid, M. et al. A comprehensive review on Cu2ZnSnS4 (CZTS) thin film for solar cell: forecast issues and future anticipation. Opt. Quantum Electron. 53, 656 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Green, M. A. et al. Solar cell efficiency tables (version 64). Prog. Photovoltaics Res. Appl. 32, 425–441 (2024).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Su, Z. et al. Device postannealing enabling over 12% efficient solution-processed Cu2ZnSnS4 solar cells with Cd2+ substitution. Adv. Mater. 32, e2000121 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Shi, J. et al. Multinary alloying for facilitated cation exchange and suppressed defect formation in kesterite solar cells with above 14% certified efficiency. Nat. Energy 9, 1095–1104 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wang, W. et al. Device characteristics of CZTSSe thin‐film solar cells with 12.6% efficiency. Adv. Energy Mater. 4, 1301465 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Yan, C. et al. Cu2ZnSnS4 solar cells with over 10% power conversion efficiency enabled by heterojunction heat treatment. Nat. Energy 3, 764–772 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gong, Y. et al. Sn4+ precursor enables 12.4% efficient kesterite solar cell from DMSO solution with open circuit voltage deficit below 0.30 V. Sci. China Mater. 64, 52–60 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chen, S. et al. Classification of lattice defects in the kesterite Cu2ZnSnS4 and Cu2ZnSnSe4 earth-abundant solar cell absorbers. Adv. Mater. 25, 1522–1539 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Scragg, J. J. et al. Effects of back contact instability on Cu2ZnSnS4 devices and processes. Chem. Mater. 25, 3162–3171 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Karade, V. et al. Insights into kesterite’s back contact interface: a status review. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 200, 109911 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Crovetto, A. et al. What is the band alignment of Cu2ZnSnS(Se)4 solar cells? Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 169, 177–194 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kim, S. et al. Identification of killer defects in kesterite thin-film solar cells. ACS Energy Lett. 3, 496–500 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Duan, B. et al. Underlying mechanism of the efficiency loss in CZTSSe solar cells: disorder and deep defects. Sci. China Mater. 63, 2371–2396 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Nisika et al. Progress and prospects of CZTSSe/CdS interface engineering to combat high open-circuit voltage deficit of kesterite photovoltaics: a critical review. J. Mater. Chem. A 8, 21547–21584 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhou, J. et al. Control of the phase evolution of kesterite by tuning of the selenium partial pressure for solar cells with 13.8% certified efficiency. Nat. Energy 8, 526–535 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gong, Y. et al. Ag incorporation with controlled grain growth enables 12.5% efficient kesterite solar cell with open circuit voltage reached 64.2% Shockley–Queisser limit. Adv. Funct. Mater. 31, 2101927 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Gong, Y. et al. Identifying the origin of the VOC deficit of kesterite solar cells from the two grain growth mechanisms induced by Sn2+ and Sn4+ precursors in DMSO solution. Energy Environ. Sci. 14, 2369–2380 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Liu, F. et al. Nanoscale microstructure and chemistry of Cu2ZnSnS4/CdS interface in kesterite Cu2ZnSnS4 solar cells. Adv. Energy Mater. 6, 1600706 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Fan, P. et al. Enhancing Ag-alloyed Cu2ZnSnS4 solar cell performance by interfacial modification via In and Al. J. Mater. Chem. A 9, 25196–25207 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Yin, W. J. et al. Engineering grain boundaries in Cu2ZnSnSe4 for better cell performance: a first‐principle study. Adv. Energy Mater. 4, 1300712 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Gokmen, T. et al. Band tailing and efficiency limitation in kesterite solar cells. Appl. Phys. Lett. 103, 103506 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Li, J. et al. Unveiling microscopic carrier loss mechanisms in 12% efficient Cu2ZnSnS4 solar cells. Nat. Energy 7, 754–764 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Grossberg, M. et al. Photoluminescence study of defect clusters in Cu2ZnSnS4 polycrystals. Curr. Appl. Phys. 14, 447–450 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Nellist, P. D. & Pennycook, S. J. Incoherent imaging using dynamically scattered coherent electrons. Ultramicroscopy 78, 111–124 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Rafferty, B. et al. On the origin of transverse incoherence in Z-contrast STEM. J. Electron Microsc. 50, 227–233 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Maticiuc, N. et al. XPS study of OH impurity in solution processed CdS thin films. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 160, 211–216 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Zhou, S. et al. Accelerating electron-transfer and tuning product selectivity through surficial vacancy engineering on CZTS/CdS for photoelectrochemical CO2 reduction. Small 17, e2100496 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Fumitaka Goto, K. S. Masaya Ichimura defect reduction in electrochemically deposited CdS thin films by annealing in O2. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 50, 147–153 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Grini, S. et al. Strong interplay between sodium and oxygen in kesterite absorbers: complex formation, incorporation, and tailoring depth distributions. Adv. Energy Mater. 9, 1900740 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Sardashti, K. et al. Impact of nanoscale elemental distribution in high‐performance kesterite solar cells. Adv. Energy Mater. 5, 1402180 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Yu, Z. et al. Unveiling the selenization reaction mechanisms in ambient air‐processed highly efficient kesterite solar cells. Adv. Energy Mater. 13, 2300521 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Li, W. et al. Tuning band alignment at grain boundaries for efficiency enhancement in Cu2ZnSnS4 solar cells. ACS Nano 17, 15742–15750 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Lou, L. et al. Crown ether-assisted colloidal ZnO window layer engineering for efficient kesterite (Ag,Cu)2ZnSn(S,Se)4 solar cells. ACS Energy Lett. 8, 3775–3783 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Chen, G. et al. Suppressing buried interface nonradiative recombination losses toward high-efficiency antimony triselenide solar cells. Adv. Mater. 36, e2308522 (2024).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Heath, J. T. et al. Bulk and metastable defects in CuIn1−xGaxSe2 thin films using drive-level capacitance profiling. J. Appl. Phys. 95, 1000–1010 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Tao, J. et al. Solution-processed SnO2 interfacial layer for highly efficient Sb2Se3 thin film solar cells. Nano Energy 60, 802–809 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Shi, J. et al. Opto-electro-modulated transient photovoltage and photocurrent system for investigation of charge transport and recombination in solar cells. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 87, 123107 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Shi, J. et al. From ultrafast to ultraslow: charge-carrier dynamics of perovskite solar cells. Joule 2, 879–901 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Li, Y. et al. Exploiting electrical transients to quantify charge loss in solar cells. Joule 4, 472–489 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Fan, P. et al. Over 10% efficient Cu2CdSnS4 solar cells fabricated from optimized sulfurization. Adv. Funct. Mater. 32, 2207470 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Tang, R. et al. Heterojunction annealing enabling record open-circuit voltage in antimony triselenide solar cells. Adv. Mater. 34, e2109078 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Qi, Y. et al. Synergistic effect of Mn on bandgap fluctuations and surface electrical characteristics in Ag-based Cu2ZnSn(S,Se)4 solar cells. J. Mater. Chem. A 9, 2292–2300 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Xie, W. et al. 10.24% efficiency of flexible Cu2ZnSn(S,Se)4 solar cells by pre-evaporation selenization technique. Small 18, e2201347 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant 52472225 to G.L.), Shenzhen University 2035 Program for Excellent Research (grant 2024B003 to G.L.), Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (grant 2025A1515012041 to G.L.) and Science and Technology plan project of Shenzhen (grant 20220808165025003 to G.L.) China. We acknowledge the assistance on (TEM/STEM/FIB) received from the Electron Microscope Center of Shenzhen University. We acknowledge the assistance on TPC and TPV by Q. Meng of the Chinese Academy of Sciences. We acknowledge the assistance on DLTS by S. Wu of Henan University. We acknowledge the assistance on KPFM by Y. Zhang at Nankai University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

G.L. supervised the project and conceived the ideas. T.W. and Z.W. prepared the thin films, fabricated the solar cells, conducted data analysis and characterization. S.C., Z.S., P.L. and Z.Z. helped to design the experiments. H.M. and J.L. assisted with device optimization and data collection. T.W., S.C., Z.S. and Z.W. drafted the paper. G.L. T.W., S.C., Z.S. and X.Z. were involved in the paper writing and revisions. All the authors approved the final version of the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guangxing Liang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Energy thanks Alejandro Perez-Rodriguez and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Notes 1–9, Figs. 1–28 and references.

Reporting Summary

Supplementary Data 1

Source data for Supplementary Fig. 1.

Supplementary Data 2

Source data for Supplementary Fig. 2.

Supplementary Data 3

Source data for Supplementary Fig. 3.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wu, T., Chen, S., Su, Z. et al. Heat treatment in an oxygen-rich environment to suppress deep-level traps in Cu2ZnSnS4 solar cell with 11.51% certified efficiency. Nat Energy 10, 630–640 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-025-01756-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-025-01756-2

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing