Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

The case for a lunar anthropocene

Nature Geoscience volume 17, pages 2–4 (2024)Cite this article

Subjects

This article has been updated

Human exploration of the Solar System began on the Moon during the space race of the mid-twentieth century. To facilitate documentation and study of the human influence on the Moon, we argue it is time to designate a ‘Lunar Anthropocene’.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on SpringerLink
  • Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: The geologic timescale for the Moon.
Fig. 2: Examples of archaeological artifacts and features on the Moon.

Change history

  • 24 June 2024

    In the version of the article initially published, the Fig. 2g legend originally said “footprints from Apollo 13” which has now been amended to “footprints from Apollo 12” in the HTML and PDF versions of the article.

References

  1. Ilardo, M. & Nielsen, R. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 53, 77–82 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hublin, J.-J. et al. Nature 546, 289–292 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Waters, M. R. Science 365, eaat5447 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Wilkinson, B. H. Geology 33, 161 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kemp, D. B., Sadler, P. M. & Vanacker, V. Nat. Commun. 11, 6012 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Crutzen, P. J. & Stoermer, E. F. Glob. Change Newsl. 41, 17–41 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Zalasiewicz, J. et al. GSA Today 18, 4–8 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lewis, S. L. & Maslin, M. A. Nature 519, 171–180 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Waters, C. N. & Turner, S. D. Science 378, 706–708 (2022).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Witze, A. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-022-00542-4 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Peeters, W. New Space 6, 187–190 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Crutzen, P. J. Nature 415, 23 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Glikson, A. Anthropocene 3, 89–92 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Waters, C. N., Zalasiewicz, J. A., Williams, M., Ellis, M. A. & Snelling, A. M. A Stratigraphical Basis for the Anthropocene? (Geological Society of London, 2014); https://doi.org/10.1144/SP395.18

  15. Subramanian, M. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-01641-5 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Steffen, W., Broadgate, W., Deutsch, L., Gaffney, O. & Ludwig, C. Anthr. Rev. 2, 81–98 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Schäfer, G. Anthropocene Working Group proposes Crawford Lake as GSSP candidate site of the Anthropocene series. Max Planck Institute of Geoanthropology (12 July 2023); https://go.nature.com/3R4zW7D

  18. Witze, A. Nature 612, 397–399 (2022).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Wilhelms, D., McCauley, J. & Trask, N. The geologic history of the Moon (US Government Printing Office, 1987).

  20. Holcomb, J. A. et al. Geoarchaeology 38, 513–533 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Prem, P., Hurley, D. M., Goldstein, D. B. & Varghese, P. L. J. Geophys. Res. Planets 125, e2020JE006464 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. UCS Satellite Database (Union of Concerned Scientists, accessed 22 August 2022); https://www.ucsusa.org/resources/satellite-database

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank H. Erftenbeck, B. O’Leary, C. Runnels, D. Stewart, H. Beran and M. Niquette for helpful discussions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Kansas Geological Survey, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, USA

    Justin Allen Holcomb & Rolfe David Mandel

  2. Department of Marine, Earth, and Atmospheric Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA

    Karl William Wegmann

  3. Center for Geospatial Analytics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA

    Karl William Wegmann

Authors
  1. Justin Allen Holcomb
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rolfe David Mandel
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Karl William Wegmann
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Justin Allen Holcomb.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Holcomb, J.A., Mandel, R.D. & Wegmann, K.W. The case for a lunar anthropocene. Nat. Geosci. 17, 2–4 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-023-01347-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-023-01347-4

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing Anthropocene

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Anthropocene newsletter — what matters in anthropocene research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Anthropocene