Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

Quantify uncertainty in behavioral research

Nature Human Behaviour volume 4, pages 329–331 (2020)Cite this article

Subjects

The behavioral sciences underestimate the uncertainty of research findings and thus overestimate replicability. Metrologists in the physical sciences quantify all material components of uncertainty, even if some components must be quantified using non-statistical means. Behavioral science should follow suit.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on SpringerLink
  • Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Ioannidis, J. P. A. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 7, 645–654 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Vosk, T. & Emery, A.F. Forensic Metrology: Scientific Measurement and Inference for Lawyers, Judges, and Criminalists. (CRC Press, 2015)

  3. Working Group 1 of the Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology (JCGM/WG 1). Evaluation of Measurement Data — Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement. (BIPM, 2008).

  4. Tal, E. Philos. Sci. 78, 1082–1096 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Yong, E. Nature 485, 298–300 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Benjamin, D. J. et al. Nat. Hum. Behav. 2, 6–10 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Rigdon, E. E., Becker, J. M. & Sarstedt, M. Multivariate Behav. Res. 54, 429–443 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. McShane, B. B., Tackett, J. L., Böckenholt, U. & Gelman, A. Am. Stat. 73, 99–105 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Brownstein, N. C., Louis, T. A., O’Hagan, A. & Pendergast, J. Am. Stat. 73, 56–68 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. J. Mack Robinson College of Business, Georgia State University, Atlanta, USA

    Edward E. Rigdon

  2. Faculty of Economics and Management, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany

    Marko Sarstedt

  3. School of Business and GA21, Monash University Malaysia, Selangor, Malaysia

    Marko Sarstedt

  4. Faculty of Management, Economics and Social Sciences, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany

    Jan-Michael Becker

Authors
  1. Edward E. Rigdon
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Marko Sarstedt
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jan-Michael Becker
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edward E. Rigdon.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rigdon, E.E., Sarstedt, M. & Becker, JM. Quantify uncertainty in behavioral research. Nat Hum Behav 4, 329–331 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0806-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0806-0

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing Careers

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Careers newsletter — what matters in careers research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Careers