Extended Data Fig. 6: Confirmatory factor analysis model of latent correlation between the three cognitive constructs measured by the CIS and performance on the SART. | Nature Human Behaviour

Extended Data Fig. 6: Confirmatory factor analysis model of latent correlation between the three cognitive constructs measured by the CIS and performance on the SART.

From: A unified online test battery for cognitive impulsivity reveals relationships with real-world impulsive behaviours

Extended Data Fig. 6

Model fit statistics were χ2(77) = 101.010, p = .129; RMSEA = .032 [90%CI = .009, .049]; CFI = .982; SRMR = .038. Note. NoGo50= Commission errors on no-go trials on Bounty Hunter with 50 ms stimulus onset asynchrony; NoGo200= Commission errors on no-go trials on Bounty Hunter with 200 ms stimulus onset asynchrony; NoGo1200= Commission errors on no-go trials on Bounty Hunter with 1200 ms stimulus onset asynchrony; NoGo3000= Commission errors on no-go trials on Bounty Hunter with 3000 ms stimulus onset asynchrony; Errors Block 1 = Fast identification errors on Caravan Spotter Block 1; Errors Block 1 = Fast identification errors on Caravan Spotter Block 1; Errors Block 2 = Fast identification errors on Caravan Spotter Block 2; Errors Block 3 = Fast identification errors on Caravan Spotter Block 3; Errors Block 4 = Fast identification errors on Caravan Spotter Block 4. PEBa Positive = Perseverative errors on Prospector’s Gamble basic positive feedback on previous trial; PEEn Positive = Perseverative errors on Prospector’s Gamble enhanced positive feedback on previous trial; PEBa Negative = Perseverative errors on Prospector’s Gamble basic negative feedback on previous trial; PEEn Positive = Perseverative errors on Prospector’s Gamble enhanced negative feedback on previous trial. SART = sustained attention to response task. No-Go = successful inhibitions on no-go trials of the SART. Factor scaling was performed using the reference variable method. Standardised estimates appear in bold typeface. Unstandardised estimates are in normal typeface below. Bootstrapped standard errors (10,000 posterior draws) appear in brackets. Threshold for statistical significance for associations between SART No-Go Commission Errors and the CIS factors using the Adjusted Bonferroni procedure (AB2;\(\alpha _{per\,test} = \frac{{\alpha _{familywise}}}{{k^{1 - \sqrt {\left| {\overline {r_j} } \right|} }}}\)) was α < .025.

Back to article page