Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

A call for precision in the study of behaviour and decision

Nature Human Behaviour volume 9, pages 433–436 (2025)Cite this article

Subjects

By definition, behavioural and decision scientists study behaviour and decision — but they rarely define these concepts, which results in divergent interpretations across studies. Researchers should give precise definitions of these concepts to enhance theoretical understanding and develop more effective and ethical interventions.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on SpringerLink
  • Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Three key pieces of information researchers should provide when reporting on behaviour and decision.

References

  1. Calhoun, A. J. & El Hady, A. iScience 26, 108210 (2023).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Fasolo, B., Heard, C. & Scopelliti, I. J. Manage. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063241287188 (2024).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bergner, R. M. New Ideas Psychol. 29, 147–155 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, K. D. & Funder, D. C. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 2, 396–403 (2007).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Newell, B. R. & Shanks, D. R. Behav. Brain Sci. 37, 1–19 (2014).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hammond, K. R. Beyond Rationality: The Search for Wisdom in a Troubled Time (Oxford Univ. Press, 2007).

  7. Gold, J. I. & Shadlen, M. N. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 30, 535–574 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bringmann, L. F., Elmer, T. & Eronen, M. I. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 31, 340–346 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Herzog, S. M. & Hertwig, R. Ann. Rev. Psychol. 76, 24.1–24.31 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dolan, P. et al. J. Econ. Psychol. 33, 264–277 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychological and Behavioural Science, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK

    Dario Krpan

  2. Department of Management, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK

    Barbara Fasolo & Luc Schneider

Authors
  1. Dario Krpan
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Barbara Fasolo
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Luc Schneider
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

D.K. and B.F. conceptualized the paper. D.K., B.F. and L.S. jointly wrote the first draft and provided comments and revisions.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Barbara Fasolo.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Krpan, D., Fasolo, B. & Schneider, L. A call for precision in the study of behaviour and decision. Nat Hum Behav 9, 433–436 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-025-02111-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-025-02111-x

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing