Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

The rising danger of AI-generated images in nanomaterials science and what we can do about it

Generative AI has made it trivial to generate fake microscopy images that are indistinguishable from real images, even for experts. As researchers in nanoscience, it is time for us to face this reality and discuss strategies to conserve the integrity of our discipline.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: A comparison of real experimental images (top row) against AI-generated fakes (middle row) informed by the real images.
Fig. 2: Purely AI-generated images from text prompts through use of ChatGPT.
Fig. 3: The MAIF storage principle.

References

  1. Thorp, H. H. Science 383, 7 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hosseini, M. & Resnik, D. B. Res. Ethics 21, 1–8 (2025).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lupia, A. et al. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 121, e2319488121 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Ejima, H. et al. Science 341, 154–157 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Davydiuk, N. et al. Nanoscale 17, 252–260 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wilson, E. A. K., Kumar, P., Montjoy, D. G. & Kotov, N. A. ACS Nano 16, 13942–13948 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ni, B. et al. Adv. Mater. 35, e2208299 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Rizvi, M. H. et al. Adv. Mater. 34, e2203366 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Del Pino, P. et al. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 55, 5483–5487 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors sincerely thank V. Foliush for initially shocking us with AI replication of experimental images, P. Formanek, K. Werner Stöckelhuber and E. Bittrich for discussions, and all anonymous participants in our online survey. Q.A.B., A.F., G.K.A., L.M.L.-M, and N.A.K. acknowledge support from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) with project IDs 496201730 (Q.A.B), 451785257 (A.F.), 391977956-SFB 1357 (G.K.A), and RTG 451785257 (L.M.L.-M. and N.A.K.). W.J.P. was supported by the Cluster of Excellence 'Advanced Imaging of Matter' of the DFG - EXC 2056 - project ID 390715994. S.B., N.A.K., and L.M.L.-M. acknowledge funding from the European Research Council through ERC Synergy Grant Chiral-Pro (project ID 101166855). E.K. acknowledges funding by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research of Germany (BMBF) in the programme NanoMatFutur (grant no. 13XP5098).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Matthew Faria or Quinn A. Besford.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Davydiuk, N., Krieg, E., Gaitzsch, J. et al. The rising danger of AI-generated images in nanomaterials science and what we can do about it. Nat. Nanotechnol. 20, 1174–1177 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-025-02009-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-025-02009-9

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing