Fig. 5: Extent of cell rearrangements depends on proliferation rate. | Nature Physics

Fig. 5: Extent of cell rearrangements depends on proliferation rate.

From: Cell cycle dynamics control fluidity of the developing mouse neuroepithelium

Fig. 5

a, Laser ablation of apical junctions at E8.5 and E10.5. Apical view, anterior left, dorsal up. The laser cut was performed at t = 0 s along the yellow line. The vertex positions (asterisks) were tracked to measure the recoil velocity. Scale bars, 10 μm. b, Mean displacement of the vertices over time. Error bars, 95% CI. c, Initial recoil velocity of vertices after laser ablation at the indicated stages (Methods). Mann–Whitney test; P > 0.05 (with and without outliers). Samples sizes in b and c are as follows: E8.5 (n = 14 ablations); E10.5 (n = 11 ablations) (Supplementary Table 1). 25–75 percentile (box), median (blue), mean (red), highest/lowest observations without outliers (whiskers). d, Left: fragmentation coefficient (ϕ) for simulations with low proliferation rate kp = 0.03 h−1. Right: difference in ϕ between high (0.09 h−1; Fig. 3a) and low (0.03 h−1) kp. e, Confetti clones (red) induced at E7.5, embryos cultured from E8.5 for 42 h with vehicle or 210 μM l-mimosine. ZO1 immunostaining, white. Scale bars, 10 μm. f, Clone size quantification for e. Mann–Whitney test (two sided); *P = 0.019. Box plots as in c. Sample sizes are as follows: control (n = 382 clones); l-mimosine (n = 155 clones). g, Mean number of fragments per clone for the experiment in e and f. Corresponding fragmentation coefficient ϕ (95% CI) was obtained using a linear fit to the data for clones ≤8 cells (dashed lines). Error bars, s.e.m.; sample size as shown in f.

Source data

Back to article page