Extended Data Fig. 2: Noise floor of HOM experiment. | Nature Physics

Extended Data Fig. 2: Noise floor of HOM experiment.

From: Acoustic phonon phase gates with number-resolving phonon detection

Extended Data Fig. 2

a, Data shown in Fig. 1b in log scale, here without visibility correction (see Methods). For the single-phonon splitting experiment, we expect at most one excitation during the entire process. The ideal Pee is zero for the duration of the experiments, and in particular, it should be zero after 650 ns, when each qubit has completed its capture of the split single-phonon wavepacket. We attribute the non-zero Pee population after that time to residual qubit thermal excitations and readout errors. We display the mean Pee population Pee,floor = 0.0014 ± 0.0005 from 650 to 800 ns (dashed gray line, with uncertainty represented by the shaded area). We note the cryostat base temperature is 7 mK, but Q2 starts with a spurious (thermal-like) population of around 0.4%, which we can convert to an effective temperature of 35 mK. When interacting with the phonon channel, Q2 gradually cools to an excited state population of 0.2% or an equivalent temperature of about 31 mK. As Q2’s excitation after catching the half-phonon wavepacket is 32%, this spurious population contributes roughly ~ 0.002 × 0.32 = 6.4 × 10−4 to the Pee background. A similar estimate for Q1 gives a total background of ~ 1.3 × 10−3 to Pee, which is close to our measured background of 0.0014 ± 0.0005. b, Data shown in Fig. 1d together with PQ1 and PQ2 in log scale, again here without visibility correction. The two-phonon interference experiments use a pulse sequence similar to that for the single-phonon experiments, and the final populations for PQ1 and PQ2 are close to those for the single-phonon experiments13. We observe Pee is suppressed near τ = 0, and at τ = 0 it is consistent with the baseline noise floor Pee,floor. We thus believe Pee,floor is a reasonable estimate for the noise floor in this experiment.

Back to article page