Table 1 Studies assessing the use of CMR in MR with or without echocardiography
From: Assessment of mitral valve regurgitation by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging
Study (year) | n | Prospective study? | Correlation (r)a | Bias (ml)b |
|---|---|---|---|---|
LVSV – AoPC method | ||||
Penicka et al. (2018)13 | 258 | Yes | 0.61 | 17.1 ± 28.9 |
Heo et al. (2017)44 | 37 | Yes | PISA: 0.81 | –15.2 ± 18.3 |
2D volumetric: 0.56 | –17.4 ± 29.4 | |||
3D echo: 0.94 | 8.7 ± 11.6 | |||
Harris et al. (2017)45 | 22 | Yes | – | – |
Sachdev et al. (2017)46 | 50 | Yes | 0.79 | –0.6 (–43 to 44) |
Myerson et al. (2016)12 | 109 | Yes | – | – |
Aplin et al. (2016)47 | 72 | Yes | 0.80 | 11 ± 28 |
Lopez-Mattei et al. (2016)48 | 70 | No | 0.59 | 2 ± 17 |
Uretsky et al. (2015)19 | 103 | Yes | 0.60 | 16 (–38 to 70) |
Brugger et al. (2015)49 | 55 | Yes | 3D TOE PISA: 0.87 | –5.9 (–26.5 to 14.7) |
3D TTE PISA: 0.74 | –11.8 (–39.4 to 15.8) | |||
Choi et al. (2014)50 | 52 | Yes | 2D TTE PISA: 0.84 | –10.4 (–29.8 to 8.9) |
3D TTE PISA: 0.91 | 0.9 (–12.8 to 14.7) | |||
Van De Heyning et al. (2013)51 | 38 | Yes | 2D TTE Doppler: –0.14 | 39 (limits not reported) |
TTE PISA: 0.45 | 30 (limits not reported) | |||
Thavendiranathan et al. (2013)52 | 35 | Yes | 3D integrated PISA: 0.92 | 1.4 (–17 to 19.8) |
3D peak PISA: 0.87 | 15.3 (–10.2 to 40.8) | |||
Son et al. (2013)53 | 32 | Yes | 2D PISA: 0.55 | 7.9 (–46.9 to 62.8) |
2D VM: 0.58 | 16.7 (–44.9 to 78.2) | |||
3D FVCD: 0.85 | 5.7 (–27.9 to 39.3) | |||
Reddy et al. (2013)54 | 44 | Yes | – | – |
Cawley et al. (2013)55 | 10 | Yes | PISA: 0.96 | –4 (–29 to 22) |
Doppler: 0.85 | 21 (–28 to 72) | |||
Hamada et al. (2012)56 | 46 | Yes | EROA: 0.75 | 20 (–41 to 81) |
AROA: – | 13 (–22 to 47) | |||
Skaug et al. (2010)57 | 27 | Yes | 0.78 | –4.7 ± 30.6 |
Shanks et al. (2010)43 | 30 | Yes | 2D TTE: – | –12.4 (–45.6 to 20.8) |
3D TEE: – | –2.32 (–18.6 to 13.9) | |||
Myerson et al. (2010)58 | 55 | Yes | – | – |
Hellgren et al. (2008)59 | 18 | Yes | – | –27.5 (–65.4 to 10.3) |
Gabriel et al. (2008)60 | 27 | Yes | – | – |
Gelfand et al. (2006)61 | 107 | Yes | – | – |
Kizilbash et al. (1998)62 | 22 | Yes | 0.92 | 3 ± 13 |
Hundley et al. (1995)63 | 17 | Yes | – | – |
LVSV – RVSV method | ||||
Sukpraphrute et al. (2012)31 | 43 | No | PISA: 0.48 | –6.4 (–49 to 36) |
Kon et al. (2004)35 | 28 | No | – | – |
MVPC – AoPC method | ||||
Polte et al. (2017)64 | 40 | Yes | – | – |
Buck et al. (2008)65 | 73 | Yes | 0.63 | –13.5 ± 10.3 |
Fujita et al. (1994)66 | 19 | Yes | – | – |
4D-flow methods | ||||
Kamphuis et al. (2019)67 | 160 | No | – | – |
Feneis et al. (2018)30 | 21 | No | Direct: 0.81 | – |
Indirect: 0.97 | – | |||
Calkoen et al. (2015)37 | 32 | Yes | 0.50–0.60 | – |
Roes et al. (2009)28 | 51 | No | – | – |
Marsan et al. (2009)68 | 64 | Yes | 3D TTE: 0.94 | –0.08 (–7.7 to 7.6) |
2D TTE: – | –2.9 (–18 to 12.5) | |||
Westenberg et al. (2008)38 | 30 | No | – | – |
Other quantitative methods | ||||
Gorodisky et al. (2018)69 | 27 | Yes | CMR PISA versus echo PISA: 0.87 | – |
Uretsky et al. (2010)70 | 23 | No | – | – |
Nonquantitative methods | ||||
Heitner et al. (2012)71 | 68 | No | 0.47 | – |
Ozdogan et al. (2009)72 | 21 | No | – | – |
Buchner et al. (2008)34 | 35 | Yes | CMR EROA versus echo EROA: 0.81 | – |
Aurigemma et al. (1990)73 | 50 | Yes | – | – |
Pflugfelder et al. (1989)74 | 26 | Yes | – | – |
