Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Viewpoint
  • Published:

Implementing the 2017 McDonald criteria for the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis

Nature Reviews Neurology volume 15, pages 441–445 (2019)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

The latest revision of the McDonald criteria for the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis (MS) was published online in 2017. New features of the criteria, which were designed to facilitate earlier diagnosis of MS, include the recognition of oligoclonal bands in the cerebrospinal fluid as a possible marker of dissemination of MS pathology in time, the introduction of symptomatic lesions as a parameter to demonstrate spatial or temporal pathology dissemination, and the use of cortical lesions to demonstrate dissemination in space. In this Viewpoint, a panel of world-renowned MS specialists share their personal experiences of the new criteria to date.

Access through your institution
Buy or subscribe

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Access through your institution

Buy this article

  • Purchase on SpringerLink
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Polman, C. H. et al. Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 revisions to the McDonald criteria. Ann. Neurol. 69, 292–302 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Thompson, A. J. et al. Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: 2017 revisions of the McDonald criteria. Lancet Neurol. 17, 162–173 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Nelson, F. et al. Improved identification of intracortical lesions in multiple sclerosis with phase-sensitive inversion recovery in combination with fast double inversion recovery MR imaging. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 28, 1645–1649 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kilsdonk, I. D. et al. Increased cortical grey matter lesion detection in multiple sclerosis with 7 T MRI: a post-mortem verification study. Brain 139, 1472–1481 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. van der Vuurst de Vries, R. M. et al. Application of the 2017 revised McDonald criteria for multiple sclerosis to patients with a typical clinically isolated syndrome. JAMA Neurol. 75, 1392–1398 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Nielsen, A. S. et al. Contribution of cortical lesion subtypes at 7T MRI to physical and cognitive performance in MS. Neurology 81, 641–649 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Krieger, S. C. & Sumowski, J. New insights into multiple sclerosis clinical course from the topographical model and functional reserve. Neurol. Clin. 36, 13–25 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gama, P. D. et al. Study of oligoclonal bands restricted to the cerebrospinal fluid in multiple sclerosis patients in the city of São Paulo. Arq. Neuropsiquiatr. 67, 1017–1022 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. da Gama, P. D. et al. Oligoclonal bands in cerebrospinal fluid of black patients with multiple sclerosis. Biomed. Res. Int. 2015, 217961 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fragoso, Y. D. & Brooks, J. B. Encephalomyelitis associated with dengue fever. JAMA Neurol. 73, 1368 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Frederiksen, J. L. & Topsøe Mailand, M. Vaccines and multiple sclerosis. Acta Neurol. Scand. 136(Suppl. 201), 49–51 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Larochelle, C., Uphaus, T., Prat, A. & Zipp, F. Secondary progression in multiple sclerosis: neuronal exhaustion or distinct pathology? Trends Neurosci. 39, 325–339 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Bittner, S. & Zipp, F. AAN unveils new guidelines for MS disease-modifying therapy. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 14, 384–386 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Leray, E. et al. Evidence for a two-stage disability progression in multiple sclerosis. Brain 133, 1900–1913 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. PRISMS Study Group & The University of British Columbia MS/MRI Analysis Group. PRISMS-4: long-term efficacy of interferon-β-1a in relapsing MS. Neurology 56, 1628–1636 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. University of California, San Francisco MS-EPIC Team. Long-term evolution of multiple sclerosis disability in the treatment era. Ann. Neurol. 80, 499–510 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Tintore, M. et al. Defining high, medium and low impact prognostic factors for developing multiple sclerosis. Brain 138, 1863–1874 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Solomon, A. J. et al. The contemporary spectrum of multiple sclerosis misdiagnosis: a multicenter study. Neurology 87, 1393–1399 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Preziosa, P. et al. Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: a multicentre study to compare revised McDonald-2010 and Filippi-2010 criteria. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 89, 316–318 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kolber, P. et al. Identification of cortical lesions using DIR and FLAIR in early stages of multiple sclerosis. J. Neurol. 262, 1473–1482 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Harrison, D. M. et al. Association of cortical lesion burden on 7-T magnetic resonance imaging with cognition and disability in multiple sclerosis. JAMA Neurol. 72, 1004–1012 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ellwardt, E. et al. Maladaptive cortical hyperactivity upon recovery from experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Nat. Neurosci. 21, 1392–1403 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Zipp, F., Gold, R. & Wiendl, H. Identification of inflammatory neuronal injury and prevention of neuronal damage in multiple sclerosis: hope for novel therapies? JAMA Neurol. 70, 1569–1574 (2013).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Siller, N. et al. Serum neurofilament light chain is a biomarker of acute and chronic neuronal damage in early multiple sclerosis. Mult. Scler. 25, 678–686 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Neurology, Focus Program Translational Neuroscience (FTN) and Immunotherapy (FZI), Rhine Mein Neuroscience Network (rmn2), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany

    Frauke Zipp

  2. Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, St Michael’s Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

    Jiwon Oh

  3. Department of Neurology, Universidade Metropolitana de Santos, Santos, Sao Paulo, Brazil

    Yara Dadalti Fragoso

  4. Department of Neurology, University of California–San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA

    Emmanuelle Waubant

Authors
  1. Frauke Zipp
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jiwon Oh
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yara Dadalti Fragoso
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Emmanuelle Waubant
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Frauke Zipp, Jiwon Oh, Yara Dadalti Fragoso or Emmanuelle Waubant.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zipp, F., Oh, J., Fragoso, Y.D. et al. Implementing the 2017 McDonald criteria for the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. Nat Rev Neurol 15, 441–445 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41582-019-0194-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41582-019-0194-0

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing