Extended Data Fig. 6: Analysis of ECM synthesis and degradation markers, and proliferation, in Nrg1tm/tm and Tie2creNotch1fl/fl mutants. | Nature

Extended Data Fig. 6: Analysis of ECM synthesis and degradation markers, and proliferation, in Nrg1tm/tm and Tie2creNotch1fl/fl mutants.

From: Control of cardiac jelly dynamics by NOTCH1 and NRG1 defines the building plan for trabeculation

Extended Data Fig. 6

Related to Fig. 2. ak, m, oq, Analysis of ECM synthesis (ah) and degradation (ik) markers, BRG1 (m), Notch pathway (op) and VEGFA pathway (q) in left ventricle of Nrg1tm/tm mutants at E9.0 (aq (second left)) and Tie2creNotch1fl/fl mutants at E8.5 (aq (right)) relative to wild-type embryos (aq (left, second from the right)) showing immunofluorescence analysis of HABP (a), CD44 (b), fibronectin (c), perlecan (d), aggrecan (e), laminin (f), collagen type I (g), collagen type IV (h), BRG1 (m), DLL4 (o) and VEGFR2 (q); ISH for Mmp2 (i), Adamts5 (j), Hyal2 (k) and Efnb2 (p); and qPCR (l). n, Percentage of BRG1 positive cells compared to the total number of cells in the left ventricle endocardium and myocardium of Nrg1tm/tm(n (left)) and Tie2creNotch1fl/fl (n (right)) mutants. ru, Proliferation analysis by Ki-67 immunofluorescence of Nrg1tm/tm mutants at E9.0 (r (second left)) and E9.5–E10.0 (t (second left)); Tie2creNotch1fl/fl mutants at E8.5 (r (right)) and E9.5 (t (right)), relative to wild-type embryos (r, t, (left, second from the right); and the related quantifications of total myocardium proliferation and the proportion of trabecular cardiomyocytes compared to the total cardiomyocytes (s, u). Gene/protein expression panels: expression (arrow), reduced expression (arrowhead). In all immunofluorescence: markers associated with endocardium or ECM (red); markers associated with myocardium (orange); myocardium is stained for SMA (green dulled mask); nuclei (DAPI, blue). au, n = 3 independent embryos per genotype. l, n = 3 biological replicates each evaluated for three experimental replicates. Quantitative data are shown as mean ± s.e.m. Two-sided Student’s t-tests (without corrections for multiple comparisons) were used. Significant comparisons are indicated by numbers as follows. l, Left, 1, P = 0.0066; 2, P = 0.0038; 3, P = 0.017, 4, P = 0.035; 5, P = 0.036; right, 1, P = 0.0039; 2, P = 0.039; 3, P = 0.00053; 4, P = 0.0074; 5, P = 0.022. n, 1, P = 0.006. s, Left, 1, P = 0.029; right, 1, P = 0.012. u, Left, 1, P = 0.045; 2, P = 0.017; right, 1, P = 0.04; 2, P = 0.0031. Scale bars, 55 μm (ak, m, or) and 40 μm (t). 

Source Data.

Back to article page