Table 1 Experimental results

From: Restoring and attributing ancient texts using deep neural networks

 

Restoration

Region

Date

Method

CER (%)

Top 1 (%)

Top 20 (%)

Top 1 (%)

Top 3 (%)

Years

Ancient historian and Ithaca

18.3

71.7

    

Ithaca

26.3

61.8

78.3

70.8

82.1

29.3

Pythia

47.0

32.6

53.9

   

Ancient historian

59.6

25.3

    

Onomastics

   

21.2

26.5

144.4

  1. Evaluating methods for text restoration, geographical attribution (region) and chronological attribution (date) on I.PHI’s test set of n = 7,811 inscriptions. For ‘CER’ and ‘years’, lower scores are better. For ‘top 1’, ‘top 3’ and ‘top 20’, higher scores are better. For each metric, the best performing method is in bold.