Extended Data Fig. 5: Numerical simulation comparison between XYY and Floquet dynamics.
From: Probing site-resolved correlations in a spin system of ultracold molecules
a, Comparing magnetization dynamics for different initial states between the exact XYY model (shaded bands) and a Floquet drive with a 5.8 μs π-pulse time (points). Red: \(\left|+X\right\rangle \) initial state. Orange: \(\left|+Y\right\rangle \) initial state. The dashed line indicates the demagnetized value with N↑ = N0/2. b, Correlation dynamics compared between the exact XYY model (shaded bands) and a Floquet drive with a 5.8 μs π-pulse time (points). Top: nearest-neighbor correlations. Middle: next-nearest neighbor correlations. Bottom: next-next-nearest neighbor correlations. c, Comparing magnetization dynamics for different initial states between the exact XYY model (shaded bands) and a Floquet drive with a 58 μs π-pulse time (points). Red: \(\left|+X\right\rangle \) initial state. Orange: \(\left|+Y\right\rangle \) initial state. The dashed line indicates the demagnetized value with N↑ = N0/2. d, Correlation dynamics compared between the exact XYY model (shaded bands) and a Floquet drive with a 58 μs π-pulse time (points). Top: nearest-neighbor correlations. Middle: next-nearest neighbor correlations. Bottom: next-next-nearest neighbor correlations.
