Fig. 3: Testing of Drosophila magnetic sensing in the gravity negative-geotaxis assay. | Nature

Fig. 3: Testing of Drosophila magnetic sensing in the gravity negative-geotaxis assay.

From: No evidence for magnetic field effects on the behaviour of Drosophila

Fig. 3

a, Schematic of the apparatus. A desktop computer (1), situated outside the shielded chamber, controlled the power supplies (2), the switching box (3) and the double-wrapped three-dimensional Merritt four-coil system (4). Large parts of the 12 coils have been omitted for visual clarity; a photograph of the chamber and coils can be found in ref. 29. Tubes containing the flies (5) were placed in the centre of the coils. Temperature, light and magnetic field sensors (6) monitored the experiments continuously. These sensors were connected to a laptop (7) that also controlled the video camera (8). The flies were illuminated with UV-blue, blue or red light via an array of LEDs (9). A second LED array (10) generated infrared light for filming. b, Climbing behaviour of CS-LE flies under blue light (410–490 nm), showing the time dependence of the proportion of flies reaching 15 cm when exposed to a 300 µT magnetic field compared with sham exposure conditions with no applied magnetic field. Data are shown as mean (thick lines) and mean ± confidence interval (thin lines) for proportion data. Grey dashed line indicates the proportion of flies able to climb 15 cm in 15 s. c, Average height climbed by flies as a function of time (same conditions as b). Data are shown as mean (thick lines) and mean ± s.d. (thin lines). No significant difference between sham (0 μT) and exposed (300 µT) conditions was found. b,c, Data for 15 groups of ten flies in each condition (exposed and sham).

Back to article page