Table 1 Comparison of performance of gene-drive and sex-distorter genetic control approaches in terms of efficacy, spread and robustness
From: A male-biased sex-distorter gene drive for the human malaria vector Anopheles gambiae
Construct type | Construct name | Homing rate | Male-biased sex-ratio distortion | Spread in caged population | Population suppression | Development of resistance in cages | Impact of heterozygotes on population sizea | Component redundancy | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gene drive | dsxFCRISPRh | 92% males; 99% females | 50% | Yes | Yes | No | No | No | |
Sex-distorter gene drive | SDGDdsx | 92% males; 99% females | 93% | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | This study |
Autosomal sex distorter | gfp111A-2 | 0% | 95% | No | Yes (over-flooding ratio of 3×) | No | Yes | No | |
Y drive | NA | 100% males; 0% females* | 95%* | Yes* | NA | NA | Yes* | No | NA |