Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

Redefining druggable targets with artificial intelligence

A vast landscape of ‘undruggable’ cancer targets remains beyond the reach of conventional therapeutic agents. Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI), however, are challenging this paradigm. Synthesizing insights from a Cancer Moonshot workshop, we argue that systemically addressing the undruggable target space with AI requires a new conceptual framework. We highlight the failure of current target taxonomies and the need for benchmarking datasets, and re-evaluate clinical validation for novel AI-driven modalities.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Ostrem, J. M., Peters, U., Sos, M. L., Wells, J. A. & Shokat, K. M. Nature 503, 548–551 (2013).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Abramson, J. et al. Nature 630, 493–500 (2024).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ahdritz, G. et al. Nat. Methods 21, 1514–1524 (2024).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Shaw, D. E. et al. Commun. ACM 51, 91–97 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Boija, A. et al. Cell 175, 1842–1855 (2018).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Watson, J. L. et al. Nature 620, 1089–1100 (2023).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee, J. S. et al. Cell 184, 2487–2502 (2021).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Deng, E. Z. et al. Cell Rep. Methods 4, 100839 (2024).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Cichońska, A., Ravikumar, B. & Rahman, R. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 84, 102771 (2024).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Jin, W. et al. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.12.10.570461 (2023).

  11. Department for Science, Innovation and Technology & Kyle, P. UK to become world leader in drug discovery as Technology Secretary heads for London Tech Week. gov.uk https://www.gov.uk/government/news/uk-to-become-world-leader-in-drug-discovery-as-technology-secretary-heads-for-london-tech-week (2025).

  12. US FDA. Complex Innovative Trial Design Meeting Program. fda.gov https://www.fda.gov/drugs/development-resources/complex-innovative-trial-design-meeting-program (2024).

Download references

Acknowledgements

The workshop whose insights are summarized here was organized as part of the Cancer Moonshot initiative through joint efforts of the National Cancer Institute (NCI), Department of Energy (DOE), Advanced Research Projects Agency for Health (ARPA-H), and Food and Drug Administration (FDA). We thank the workshop organizing committee (J. Couch, S. Hanlon, A. Kilianski, J. Klemm, R. Philip and A. Predith) and all participants for their valuable contributions to the discussions and insights that shaped this Comment. Special thanks to the staff at the Hubert Humphrey Building for hosting the workshop and providing logistical support. This work was partially supported by the Cancer Moonshot initiative. The views expressed in this Comment are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of any government agency or institution.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

O.E. and R.B. co-chaired the workshop. All authors provided intellectual input via workshop discussions. O.E. drafted the manuscript. All authors reviewed, edited and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Regina Barzilay or Olivier Elemento.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

A.B. is an employee and shareholder of Dewpoint Therapeutics and holds multiple patents related to the work discussed in this Comment. A.C. is an employee and stock option holder at Harmonic Discovery. K.A. is stock holder in Schrodinger and Nautilus Biotechnology. M.A. is a member of the scientific advisory boards of Cyrus Biotechnology, Deep Forest Sciences, Nabla Bio, Oracle Therapeutics, and Achira. O.E. is co-founder and stock holder in Volastra Therapeutics, holds stock in Freenome, serves as a member of the scientific advisory board (SAB) and holds stock options in Owkin, Harmonic Discovery, and Exai, is an SAB member for Canary Biosciences, and is receiving or has received funding from Eli Lilly, J&J/Janssen, Sanofi, AstraZeneca, and Volastra. J.C., M.G., M.H., W.J., W.A.K., N.K., M.V.L., J.M., L.S., G.T., J.Z., and R.B. declare no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Akinsanya, K., AlQuraishi, M., Boija, A. et al. Redefining druggable targets with artificial intelligence. Nat Biotechnol 43, 1416–1418 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-025-02770-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-025-02770-1

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing: Translational Research

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Translational Research newsletter — top stories in biotechnology, drug discovery and pharma.

Get what matters in translational research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Translational Research